(Here is the list of all web pages from this
server, arranged by language (in 8 languages).
Choose the page that interests you by
dragging scroll bars, then click on this
page to run it:)
(The same list can be displayed from
"Menu 1" by clicking over there on
"Menu 2".)
Here is the list of all my web pages from all servers.
These are arranged primarily by language
(i.e. as web pages in Polish,
English, German,
French, Spanish,
Italian, Greek, and
Russian.) For each language web pages are
arranged by their subjects.
Choose the page that interests you by dragging scroll bars, then click on this
page to run it:
(The same list can be displayed from
"Menu 1" by clicking over there on
"Menu 4".)
According to data from the
Bible (the authorisation of which God admits),
the physical world was created by God just only around
6 thousands years ago. But according to the "body of evidence"
that was dug out by the Earthly scientists, our universe
is already around 14 billions years old. So one out of
these two ages of the world must be untrue. From the
point of view of philosophy and theory of probability it
is impossible that the nature could demonstrate just by
pure coincidence all these supernatural phenomena
and miracles that we can register on the Earth.
Thus statements of the Bible cannot be untrue.
Furthermore, considering the
role which God performs towards people, we should
NOT be suspecting that God would tell a lie in the holy
book that He authorises - which is the Bible. Even if this
God is just a "God-youngster" just 6-thousands years
old who still likes to play jokes. But simultaneously we
should NOT suspect that this 6-thousands year old omnipotent
God-youngster is completely deprived a sense of humour.
Thus, with an equal easiness as around 6 thousands years
ago this God created the physical world and humans,
He could additionally invent, create, and introduce to
the world that He created, this "body of evidence" on
the basis of which scientists estimate the age of the
universe to be around 14 billions years. After all, if
God was able to create every living creature, He was
also able to create e.g. petrified skeletons of dinosaurs
feigning them so that they look as if they were extinct
several millions years ago. Since this omnipotent
God was able to create atoms of all chemical elements,
with an equal easiness He could also create geological
layers and provide them with such attributes that they
allow to carry out the "conventional dating" used by
Earthly scientists. Since this God needed to experiment
on, and perfect, humans that He created, with an equal
easiness He could also feign the existence of a "natural
evolution" and inspire Darwin to publish the theory of it.
This web page analyses items of evidence for just such
a possibility that was NOT verified, as yet, by anyone.
Means it analyses the possibility that omnipotent God
for important reasons firstly invented and then implanted
into the physical world that He created, this additional,
untrue, "simulated history of the universe and man"
(in addition to the true history which God described in
the Bible). In turn present scientists on the Earth are
taking this additional history invented by God for the
true history.
Part #A:
Introductory information about this web page:
#A1.
Is it possible that by fabricating the "big bang" and "natural evolution"
God
just played a joke on the pompously negating Him scientists?
If God does NOT exist, while time would pass
irreversibly - as this is described by the
present science, then all past events would
occur just once only, while the universe and
man would have just a single history. In such
a case everything that scientists determine in
the result of researching the existing evidence
would be an objective truth. For example, the
truth could be that there is just a single history
of the universe, that the universe originates from
the "big bang", that in fact there was a past
which to people is told e.g. by petrified skeletons
of dinosaurs, and that man originates from
a natural evolution. But if there is the omnipotent
God while time has a reversible software nature -
as this is described by the
theory of everything
called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
(while illustrates the web page
immortality.htm - about the access of people to immortality and to the never-ending life),
then all past events can be changed by this God
any number of times, until God accomplishes with these
changes such outcomes which He needs. In turn the
universe and man can have at least two histories -
out of which only one is true, while the remaining
ones can be simulated by God in order to accomplish
some Godly goals. In such a case practically every
"fact" which scientists establish in the result of
research on the body of evidence present in the
universe could be just a fantastic simulation and
illusion passed off upon people by God for some
higher reasons. For example, the history which is
told by e.g. petrified skeletons of dinosaurs would
only be a kind of fantastic story which the omnipotent
God intentionally invented and for important reasons
simulated into the physical world that He was creating.
In reality packs of dinosaurs could never run over
our planet - although God could create one or several
of them from each species just to check whether their
bodies and bones are realistic and work correctly in
the physical world. (Of course, there is also a
possibility that God have NOT gone through the trouble
of verifying in action bodies of all dinosaurs. For example,
research described in the article "Answer to how giant
flying dinosaurs got airborne", from page A15 of the
New Zealand newspaper
"Weekend Herald",
issue dated on Saturday, January 10, 2009, reveal that
many scientists have serious doubts whether the weighting
over a quarter of ton flying dinosaurs from the family
called "pterosaurs" could at all become airborne.)
This web page is just about a second, simulated
(invented by God) history of the universe and man,
which in spite that it is confirmed by supposedly
"objective" evidence, in reality is untrue.
#A2.
What vital reasons had
God
to create the "simulated history of the universe and the humanity" -
means to created an invented opposite to the "real history of
the universe and the humanity":
The introduction and the previous item of this
web page explained to us the shocking fact
which most clearly NO-ONE considered before,
and which to people was revealed only by the
most moral philosophy on the Earth called
totalizm
(means the philosophy of discovering and stating truths).
This fact reveals, that the universe which
surrounds us in fact has at least two different
histories. This true one is described in the
Bible authorised by God Himself -
e.g. see the Biblical Book of Genesis (1:1 to 2:4).
Data contained in it allowed to determine that
the physical world is just around 6000 years
old, and that together with humans it was created
by God - for details see subsection JA1.3 in monograph
[8/2].
But for important reasons, independently
from this "true history of the universe
and mankind" God clearly created
also a completely different "simulated history
of the universe and man". This simulated
history of the universe is a kind of fantastic
story which God intentionally invented and then
"implanted" into His final product that He created,
means implanted into the Earth and into the physical
world. This story states approximately the same
that present scientists claim. In turn these scientists
claim that e.g. the universe is around 13.73 (with
the accuracy +/-0.12) billion years old, that the
man originates from an "evolution" - NOT from
a creation by God, and that before people on the
Earth horrifying and barbaric "dinosaurs" used
to live.
For some people the fact of the existence of two
different histories of the universe can seem to be
a kind of "Godly cheating". After all, these people
do not understand that only people "cheat",
while God just creates new paths and opens
for people increasingly wider perspectives. Whatever
God does, He always has for this extremely important
reasons. So let us now list most important reasons
which probably motivated God when He created
this second, untrue, simulated history of the universe
and the man.
(1) Inspiring people to scientific searches.
After all, if existed just only one history of the
universe and people, namely this true one, then
nothing would be for seeking and for researching.
This is because this history is described just in
several sentences by the
Bible authorised by God Himself.
As such, it does NOT inspire the interest in people,
neither it fascinates them. So no-one would wish to
research it. In turn without scientific research people
would NOT experience any progress. So in addition to
this true history, God was forced to invent and to
implant into His creation, a kind of fabulous history,
which leads people from one discovery to another
one, stimulating their imagination and inspiring
scientific research.
(2) Allowing the cultivation of atheistic view of the
world by some people. On several web pages
of totalizm it was explained, that if the humanity was
composed of exclusively people who deeply believe
in God, then the humanity would live in caves until
today and would NOT known even a secret of fire.
This is because people who deeply believe in God
are typically very passive, as their deep faith in God
deprives them the courage to carry out scientific
research. The explanation of this paradox the reader
can find, amongst others, in item #F2 of the web page
evil.htm - about origins of all evil on the Earth,
and in item #A2 in the web page
will.htm - about the impact of "free will" at fate of the entire human civilisation.
Therefore God is was forced to give to people also another
possibility of living according to the atheistic view of the
world. After all, such an atheistic view of the world inspires
people to research and to form a progress. So in order to
inspire amongst people such atheistic view of the world,
God was forced to create and to pass off upon people
various encouragements for creative scientific searches.
In His superior wisdom God gave to these encouragements
a form of alternative history of the universe and man,
which present human science considers to be a "scientific
history".
(3) Illustrative demonstration to people the creative
power of God. If God does NOT introduce to the
world that He created an invented history of the kind
which is being "discovered" by the present science,
then the history of the universe would be uninteresting
and deprived the ability to inspire. It would just reflect
the fact that God created planets, lands, seas, living
creatures, and man. As such, it would NOT demonstrate
to people the creative power of God. In turn people
have tendencies to doubt and to negate the creative
capabilities of God. So in order to illustrate to people,
how immense is His creative power, into the world that
He created, God implanted this fantastic history
of the universe that He make up. So when people
finally recognise the findings of the philosophy of
totalizm
and begin to understand that this "simulated history of
the universe and man" which is discovered by the human
science, is the untrue history, then they simultaneously
realise how huge is the power and capabilities of God
who was able to invent such a history and to implant it
into the fabric of the universe.
(4) Subjecting people to trials and to exams. For
reasons explained more extensively in item #F1 of the web page
evil.htm - about origins of all evil on the Earth,
and in item #C6 of the web page
god.htm - about the secular and scientific understanding of God,
God continually subjects every inhabitant of the Earth
to countless tests and exams. Then, depending on outcomes
of each such a test, God qualifies a given person to
appropriate category. Of course, in order to be able
to subject people to these trials and exams, God needs
to have a kind of "exam questions or exam problems"
which every person separately must then solve on his
or on her own. The existence of two contradictive histories
of the world (i.e. (1) religious history, and (2) atheistic
history) is just one amongst such questions-problems
to be solved during the Godly trial-exam.
(5) Challenging people to seek well hidden truth.
The main reason for which God created the man
is a more effective gathering of knowledge. This
reason I am explaining more comprehensively in
items #B1 to #B3 of the web page
will.htm - about the impact of "free will" at fate of the entire human civilisation,
and in item #C1 of the web page
god.htm - about scientific replies of the secular philosophy of totalizm to basic questions about God.
The need to increase the knowledge is even more
urgent because of the "young age" of our God. So
in order people could assist God in His searches
for knowledge, they must acquire specific kinds
of attributes. Therefore, in order to develop in
people these attributes that God needs, God
continually challenges people with ever-increasingly
ambitious challenges. One amongst these challenges
is the existence of two completely opposite histories
of the world, and the need that every person must
take and justify his or her own stand which one
amongst these two histories he or she considers
to be true. This web page in fact becomes a part
of such a challenge.
(6) Masking from some people the fact that God in
fact is still "inexperienced youngster". The
true history of the world reveals that our God is
still "inexperienced youngster" which still has a
great sense of humour and still likes to play jokes
on people. After all, He created the physical world
just only around 6 thousands years ago. Thus
He Himself probably finished His self-evolution
and gained the self-consciousness only shortly
before - as this is explained in "part #B" of this
web page. So even if several thousands of years
passed from the moment of the self-evolution of
God and acquiring His self-awareness, until the
creation of the physical world and man, still the
age of God probably does NOT exceed even
10000 years. I personally suspect that the
"software God", described in "part #B" of this
web page, is NOT older than around 7000
years. (Note that this "software God" in
Christianity is called the "Holy Ghost". We
should NOT confuse Him with the eternally
existing "God Father" which in the Bible is
also called the "Ancient of Days".) In turn
such a young age of God really qualifies
Him to the category of almost a "Godly teenager". Although in the
Bible authorised by God Himself,
God indirectly confirms the fact of His relatively
"young age", in fact in real life He is NOT very
inclined to brag about this to every human being.
Probably for this reason God "added years to His age"
in the "simulated history of the universe and man",
which He so invented and fabricated as if the universe
had already around 14 billions of years. After all such
an age inclines everyone to show respect.
(7) Documenting the God's sense of humour.
The entire body of evidence in existence, suggests
that God has a magnificent sense of humour.
Furthermore, in times when God initiated the creation
of the "body of evidence" which for scientists provides
a basis for formulation this "simulated history of the
universe and man", God already knew how pompous
and all-knowing human scientists are today.
So probably one amongst numerous motives of this
young God who still likes to play tricks on people,
was to make a mock on Godly scale of these scientists
who pompously refuse to recognise His existence
and who behave as if they "have swallowed all brains".
At this point it is worth to add, that the sole fact
of the existence of so many and so vital reasons
for the additional creation by God the "simulated history
of the universe and man", is also a confirmation
and a proof that God really gave to people these two
opposite histories of the world, namely (1) the true
history - means the one described in the Bible, and
(2) the simulated history - means the one that was
invented by God and then skilfully implanted into
the Godly creation. Therefore also this proof I
introduced to the list of proofs from item #E1
in the further section of this web page.
#A3.
In order this web page could be written, God must approve it and support it with His inspiration:
In the universe nothing happens (nor can
happen) without the approval and silent
support from the omnipotent God. After
all, God controls the software time. So
even if in the universe any events occur
which would be against the God's will, then
God still can shift time back, while in the
new elapse of time do NOT allow these events
to take place. The existence of such a method
of correcting all errors and mistakes of the
past through shifting time back, is explained
more comprehensively in item #B3 of the web page
immortality.htm - about the access of people to immortality and to lives that never end,
and also in item #C1.1 of the web page
timevehicle.htm - about mechanism of time, shifting time back, and about time vehicles.
Of course, an event that in order to occur
it must receive NOT only a silent support
from God, but additionally His inspiration
and help, was writing of this web page.
This in turn immediately induces a question:
"why God inspired and supported the writing
of this web page which explains to people that
God created two opposite histories of the world,
and that this true history is the one that is most
thoroughly hidden?" After all, many people
who are going to read this web page may
feel grudge towards God that He intentionally
leads human scientists into a blunder through
creating the "simulated history of the universe
and man", which human scientists take for a
true one. So it is worth to answer this question
for a simple reason to understand that whatever
God does, He always have very important reasons
and goals regarding it. In case of inspiring this
web page, the main reason and goal is the need
to induce in people thinking over and taking a stand
in matters raised here. After all, we people are
created by God to seek truth, while coming
closer to truth always requires in-depth consideration
of every matter from many points of view. The
inspiring of this web page has several further
goals as well. For example, in eyes of God this
web page probably is to illustrate the "human"
attributes of God, which in our mechanical
prayers are revealed by words "on earth as in heaven",
but the meaning of which truly understand only
very sparse number of people. Furthermore, God
clearly wishes to unteach us the to-date adherence
to various fears (of the kind that with our search
for truth we may commit a blasphemy), "taboo" (i.e.
intentional silencing supposedly forbidden topics),
or discriminations of selected topics because these
could offend someone's authority. After all, if
someone really tries to find a truth, then he or
she must pursue this truth and seek it without
adherence to any prejudices. God wants that
all of us are devoted to search for truth and to
adherence to truth. This is even expressed in the
Bible authorised by God Himself - see John 4:23:
"...the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him."
After all, searching for truth is the requirement
of our path to knowledge, and also the main
criterion on the basis of which God judges all
of us.
#A4.
Goals of this web page:
This web page tries to accomplish several
goals. The most important out of these is to
explain clearly why the universe
which surrounds us has as many as two
drastically opposite histories. Another goal
is to indicate to the reader which body
of evidence documents that in fact there
are two drastically different histories of the
world, out of which only one (this most thoroughly
hidden) is the true history. Still another goals
of this web page is to realise to the reader
that this true history of creation of the
physical world and man is extremely exciting,
and thus researching it is equally interesting
and full of adventure as the scientific researching
this simulated history of the universe that was
pieced together by people due to atheistic
scientific research. Only that in order to
experience the passion of scientific researching
of this true history of the creation of physical
world by God, it is necessary to learn at least
the knowledge which is make available, amongst
others, through this web page, through the web
page about the scientific
theory of everything
called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
and through several other totaliztic web pages
which are related to them.
#A5.
Fate of this web page and its editions to-date:
This web page was initiated on 23 June 2006.
The original goal of the first edition of it was
to realise that so-called "creationists" and
"evolutionists" should NOT argue and fight
with each other. After all, both these groups
in fact are correct - only that both are talking
on completely different subjects. But in 2008
I published a whole array of web pages which
document that in many matters God intentionally
"leads people astray" and makes them err, in
order to accomplish that way some His superior
goals. (For example, item #F7 of the web page
evil.htm - about origins of all evil on the Earth,
and also items #D2 to #D5 of the web page
ufo.htm - about scientific replies to fundamental questions about UFOnauts and UFO vehicles - e.g. whether they do exist, how they function, etc.
document that God intentionally simulates for
people a secretive occupation of the Earth by
evil UFOnauts, so that in this manner He can
use evil NOT under His own name as one
amongst His most effective tools for controlling
people.) Furthermore, I also published web
pages such as
immortality.htm - about the access of people to immortality and to lives that never end,
which document that God intentionally created
the reversible software time so that He can
shift that time back while in a new passage
of time so change the world that it best suits
the superior goals of God. Therefore, the situation
gradually has ripen to publish the second
edition of this web page on 25 November 2008.
In this second edition I decided to indicate openly
to the reader that the so-called "natural evolution"
and supposedly the "objective" history of the
universe that is laboriously pieced together
by present science, both describe just untrue
simulations that were invented and fabricated
by God and foisted off upon people by God in
order to accomplish a whole array of superior
goals of God.
Part #B:
The "true history of the universe and man" - means the natural self-evolution of
God
and the creation of man by God:
This part of the web page explains
with a down to earth method,
where we people come from and where
we are going. It does so by presenting
a new model of the origins of the
physical world and man. This model
is a result of findings of the
theory of everything
called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity.
It is completely opposite to the model
of so-called "Big Bang" disseminated
by official Earth's science. Simultaneously,
the essence of it is agreeable with
the model disseminated by religions - see the
Biblical
Book of Genesis (1:1 to 2:4).
Only that it makes more unambiguous
and more scientific various ambiguities
which stem from the wrong way people
interpreted an old religious terminology.
#B1.
What was the course of the self-evolution of
God -
means how everything has started:
Extremely long, long ago, there was
no Earth, no Sun, no matter, no physical
world, and even no time in the form
as we know it. The entire universe
was then just an emptiness with
infinitive dimensions. However,
according to findings of the
theory of everything
called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
somewhere within this infinitive
emptiness of the universe there was
a gigantic droplet of extraordinary
liquid called counter-matter.
Counter-matter is an exact reversal
of "matter" which human science researched
so-far. Opposite to how the matter displays
attributes of mass, inertia, or friction,
this counter-matter is weightless, does
NOT show inertia, and does NOT form
any friction. Thus, it is continuously
in a state of perpetual motion. The most
vital, however, amongst these opposite
to matter attributes of counter-matter,
are the intellectual attributes. As
we know, our matter is "stupid" in
the natural state. Thus counter-matter
is intelligent. Means, counter-matter
is able to accumulate and to store
information, and to think in the natural
state. In the sense of its attributes,
this gigantic droplet of counter-matter
was a kind of liquid computer at
the beginning of times. But this
computer initially did NOT have
any program inside. The perpetually
moving counter-matter which formed
it, at the beginning of times
already formed streams and whirls
which flew thoughtlessly from one
end to the other of this gigantic
droplet of counter-matter hanging
in emptiness of the universe of
infinitive dimensions.
The above description of initial conditions
in which the self-evolution of God took
place is NOT taken from the ceiling.
In fact there is a vast body of evidence
that it was like that. If someone is
interested in this evidence, it can be
found in volumes 4 and 5 of monographs
[1/4] and
[1/5].
In order to provide here at least a
small example of this evidence, one
amongst numerous facts that the universe
is an unlimited emptiness with no
boundaries (instead of e.g. an unlimited
space filled up with galaxies), is our
imagination. According to the findings of the
theory of everything
called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
we are unable to imagine anything that does
NOT exist in the universe - because such
a thing does NOT have a "name" nor a definition
in the language of the universe called ULT -
the "Universal Language of Thoughts".
(Descriptions of the ULT language are
provided in item #B4 of the separate
web page
telepathy.htm - about telepathy,
as well as in subsection I5.4 from volume
5 of monographs
[1/4] and
[1/5].)
As it turns out, no-one amongst us is able
to imagine infinitively large universe
filled up with "something", e.g. with galaxies.
But everyone without a difficulty is able
to imagine an emptiness of infinitive
dimensions.
During the initial stage of flowing
of this liquid counter-matter from
one end of the gigantic droplet into
another end of it, the counter-matter
kept learning. After all, counter-matter
is an intelligent liquid. This learning
resulted in various kinds of natural
programs being formed inside of the
memory of this counter-matter. (This
memory for programs and data, which
is contained inside of counter-matter,
in fact forms still another separate
world, called the virtual world.
That another "virtual world", together
with the "counter-world", and our "physical
world", is one amongst three separate
worlds contained in the universe. It is
in this "virtual world" that God resides,
means that resides the primary program
of the universe - the evolution of which
is described in this item of the web
page. It is also this virtual world
where we all land after our physical
deaths.) These programs started to gain
self-awareness. Means, they started to
know that they do exist and that they
are they. They also learned how to move
inside of counter-matter. They gained
the means to instigate counter-matter
in which they resided into carrying out
any motion that they wanted. These
natural programs that eventuated inside
of counter-matter gradually formed a
kind of self-aware creatures. Only that
these creatures had no body, but simply
were programs that resided in liquid
and intelligent counter-matter. So these
programs could be called "spiritual beings".
With the elapse of time these spiritual
beings mutually learned about the existence
of other beings similar to themselves.
A competition started between them.
This competition gradually converted into
a fight. In this fight only one program
was the winner, which managed to destroy
or absorb all other programs similar
to itself. This only remaining program
which survived from times of these fights,
is present
God.
So the superior being which currently
is called God, is simply a single huge
self-aware program which in a natural
manner evolved inside of the intelligent
counter-matter.
There is a significant body of evidence
in support of the finding that God originates
from the process of natural evolution
described above. For example, in support
of the fact that initially several spiritual
beings come to existence, which later
fought with each other, stands the
fact of inscribing by God exactly the
same competition and fight in life of
practically every living creature.
In turn, in support of the fact that
God is a huge natural program which
self-evolved in intelligent (liquid)
counter-matter, stand the fact that
a program is a relatively easy for
self-evolving inside of an intelligent
computer which in an unaware manner
carries out some physical activities.
The detailed description of this evidence
for the self-evolution of God is provided
in item #B3 below.
After God self-evolved, He learned how
to control absolutely the behaviours of
liquid counter-matter in which He resided.
Lonely existence induced in Him the longing
for creating from this counter-matter
similar creatures which would be on His
image, but which would also be inferior
towards Him - so that they would not
compete with Him and He would not need
to fight with them. Furthermore, lonely
God soon discovered that His capability
to learn are also limited - means when
acting alone He is NOT able to learn and
discover as much as He would be able when
He acts in a larger group. In this manner
He come to the idea of creating our "physical
world", and creating the man.
* * *
Independently from this item, the process of
the self-evolution of the second component
of God described here, means this huge
natural program which religions call the
"Holy Ghost" while the philosophy of totalizm
calls the "universal intellect", is presented
on two further web pages, namely in item
#I2 from "part #I" of the separate web page
about the
theory of everything
called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
and also in item #B12 of the web page about
God.
I highly recommend having a look at these
web pages. After all, they extend information
provided in this item.
#B2.
Why a "natural evolution" in fact did occur
in the universe, only that the product of it was
God
not man:
Motto:
"The existence of God is NOT at all contradictive to the official human science. It is the
official human science that still insist to remain in contradiction against truth and reality."
I wonder whether the reader ever asked
himself a question as to "what has a greater
chance to happen just by a pure accident -
something that is simple, or something that
is complicated"? For example, let us assume
that there is already a self-learning computer,
and also an empty ocean. What is to happen
first just by a pure chance, i.e. a program is
to appear first in this self-learning computer,
or a living creature is to appear first in this empty
ocean. I thought already about this problem.
In my opinion, the more simple something is,
the greater chance it has to happen by a pure
chance. After all, everything that is complicated
requires the simultaneous appearance of a
much larger number of phenomena that are working
for the benefit of it. Therefore, for example dropping
down a coconut from a coconut palm and hitting
someone into head has a much higher chance
of accidental occurrence than someone's climbing
a coconut palm and splitting his head there by
accidental hitting a coconut. So if this logical
finding we relate to the previous question
about what is to appear first: a program in
a self-learning computer, or a creature in
an empty ocean, the reply must be a program.
The reason is that a program is incomparably
simpler in the structure than even a simplest living
creature. A walking proof of this fact are present
scientists. After all, almost every present scientist
is able to make programs for a computer.
But in fact no present scientist on Earth is able
to synthesize from a zero even a smallest
blade of a most primitive grass.
The question from previous paragraph has
a huge merit in the matter of origins of man.
In fact, the reply to it conclusively confirms that
humans do NOT originate from the process of
a purely accidental evolution, but in fact were
created by
God.
But simultaneously it is God who originates from
an accidental evolution of the same type which
present scientists attribute to the origins of man.
The logical and evidential basis from which the
finding was deducted that God himself
originates from a natural evolution, in turn
after he come to existence this God created
initially the physical world, and then man,
are described more comprehensively in
"part I" of the separate web page about the
theory of everything
called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity.
I recommend this web page to readers who
are interested in a deeper investigation of
this matter. At this point it suffices to explain,
that God is a huge program which in a
completely natural manner evolved inside
of a "liquid computer" called "counter-matter.
This character of God as a huge natural
program contained inside of self-learning
and thinking counter-matter is explained
in more details on the separate web page about
god.htm - about scientific replies of the secular philosophy of totalizm to basic questions about God.
In turn, being a huge program, God represents
a simple structure which is much less complicated
than any living tissues. As such a simple structure,
God had a much larger probability than a living
creature to evolve in a natural (accidental)
evolution. In turn, when God once came to
existence, then all the further accidental
evolution ceased to happen. This is because
everything that came to existence after God,
was intelligently and purposely designed and
then created by this already existing God.
After all, God had no difficulty with creating
even the most structurally complicated physical
world as well as man. The process of evolution
of God, and the later creation of the physical
world and humans by this God, is described
more comprehensively in the abovementioned
"part #I" of the separate web page about the
theory of everything
called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity.
But because the reader may not have an
access to this separate web page, repeated
below are most vital descriptions from it.
#B3.
Sources of our difficulties with acceptance
of the above model of natural self-evolution of
God,
together with examples of evidence for the
correctness of this model:
Motto:
"In the beginning was the Word,
and the Word was with God,
and the Word was God. He was
with God in the beginning.
Through him all things were
made; without him nothing was
made that has been made. In
him was life, and that life
was the light of men. The
light shines in the darkness,
but the darkness has not understood
it. There came a man who was
sent from God; his name was John."
(Quotation from the
Bible, John 1:1-14.)
The majority of people have significant
difficulties with logical and comprehensive
acceptance of anything that differs
from their habits, that runs against
their interests, that is based on the
existence of infinity, etc. Therefore,
in the model and explanation provided
before for the natural self-evolution
of God, the majority of people is to
reject this explanation under the excuse
that it contains infinity. But real
sources of this rejection are going
to originate from any amongst following
facts:
(i)
Thinking in finite categories.
Everything that surrounds us and that
we can examine with the use of our
senses, has a finite character. Means
everything has a beginning and an end,
limited size, specific duration, etc.
Therefore, the majority of people acquire
the habit of thinking exclusively
in finite categories. So if we tell
such people, that something is infinitively
large, or is lasting infinitively,
then they ask curiously "but what
is behind this". In turn when we
inform them that something lasts
infinitively long, such people ask,
"but what was before it", or "what
is to be after that". On the other
hand, the existence of infinity is
a fact. It exists in mathematics.
It also exists in our imagination
(e.g. the majority of us can imagine
infinitively long life, or infinitively
long love). It also exists in the
reality of the universe. The infinitively
wide universe is a fact and in order
to understand it one needs to just
shift his or her thinking to the
category of infinity. In turn when
someone gets into the considerations
of the type presented in previous
item, then such a someone never
would be able to reach any valid
conclusions unless accepts the
existence of infinity. Without
accepting it, he or she is going
to trot in one place, unproductively
trying to solve a dilemma "what
was earlier - an egg or a hen".
(After all, in the finite world
before an egg a hen must exist,
while before a hen an egg needed
to be. Only in the infinitive universe
which includes God, one can precisely
define that after all an egg needed
to be created first - means program
and information, and only then a hen
could develop from this egg.)
(ii)
Religious indoctrination. This indoctrination
pre-programmed all faithful with the
belief that it was God that existed
infinitively long, not some "gigantic
droplet of counter-matter". The problem
is only, that this indoctrination does
NOT explain which precisely amongst
God's Trinity existed infinitively
long, namely whether it was God Father,
or Holy Ghost, or perhaps God Son -
after all according to Christianity
God is composed out of these three
Holy Parts. People deeply religious,
for which God is the matter of faith,
not the matter of knowledge, will reject
the previous explanations on the basis
that supposedly these contradict their
religious upbringing. Of course, they
will be wrong in this. After all, if
one analyses carefully explanations from
the previous item about the self-evolution
of God, then it turns out that these
explanations state exactly the same as
every religion does. Only that they do
this much more precisely and that they
explain everything in terms of logic
and knowledge, not in terms of belief.
After all, they explain that the
component of God which by Christianity
is called "God Father" or "Ancient
of Days" (means "counter-matter")
in fact existed infinitively long -
means always. To the evolution was
subjected only this component of God
which Christianity calls "Holy Ghost"
or the "Word" - means the natural program
that resides inside of this counter-matter.
So the rejection of the previous explanations
on the basis of religious indoctrination
is simply fighting about terminology
without analysis the merit of the matter.
(iii)
Suppressing the findings of the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity by
makers of evil.
A serious problem with the free
dissemination of findings of the
theory of everything
called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
is that a powerful terrorist-occupational
organization acts secretly on the Earth,
the existence of which this concept reveals.
This organization with all power and at any
cost tries to suppress, hold back, scoff,
neutralize, sabotage, scare, silence, or
overpower with noise, the dissemination
of this concept. Thus such sections of
this concept which still manage to
break through barriers that this organization
raises, are vigorously fought out. This
fighting is clearly visible in the
smearing campaign which is currently
carried out in internet about this concept.
* * *
Because of the action of the above factors,
the model of the development of the universe
and the evolution of God, explained
previously in item #B1, meets a lot of irrational
and sinister resistance on the path,
before it is able to break through to
the awareness of humans. Fortunately
for this model, there is a sufficient
body of evidence which confirms the
correctness of it, and the agreeability
of it with truth. Therefore, for the use
of these readers who wish to cement their
rational knowledge, or who need evidence
in order to defend the model presented
here against attacks of e.g. the "makers
of evil", I am going to provide below at
least the most representative examples of
this evidence. Here are the most known
examples of it:
(1)
Information contained in religions which
confirm the correctness of the model
provided here. In spite that
these are highly religious people
who have significant reluctance to
accepting the self-evolution of God,
actually in statements of religions
the highest number of confirmations
of the correctness of the model
described here is contained. The
only problem is, that so-far
there
was no key for a correct
interpretation of these information -
such as e.g. the key provided
presently to us by the Concept
of Dipolar Gravity. Therefore,
people interpreted these information
in a wrong manner. Let us list below
several amongst such confirming
statements of religions, together
with explanations how one should
interpret them:
(1a)
"In the beginning was the Word,
and the Word was with God,
and the Word was God. He was
with God in the beginning.
Through him all things were
made; without him nothing was
made that has been made. In
him was life, and that life
was the light of men. The
light shines in the darkness,
but the darkness has not understood
it. There came a man who was
sent from God; his name was John."
(Quotation from the Bible, John 1:1-14.)
In times when religions were formed,
people did NOT know present terminology
such as "program" or "computer".
So in order to express somehow,
that on the very beginning of
everything a "program" come to
the existence, they needed to
use a different terminology that
was known to them, and that was
closest to the idea of program.
This closest term was "word" -
means information, means algorithm
and program.
(1b)
"God exists as a Holy Trinity" (in three parts).
For example, the Christian religion
clearly distinguishes (1) "counter-matter"
(means "God Father" or the "Ancient
of Days" - i.e. a liquid computer
in which the program of God resides),
from (2) the "natural program of God"
(means from the entity that Christian
religion calls the "Holy Ghost", while
the philosophy of totalizm
calls the "universal intellect"), and from (3)
the "physical world" which was created
by this God (means from the "God Son").
(It is worth to add here, that Hinduism
also distinguishes a similar "Holy Trinity".
Only that this (1) "liquid computer" means
the Christian "God Father" or the "Ancient
of Days" it calls the "creator" - means the
God Brahma. In turn (2) the "universal
intellect" means the Christian "Holy Ghost"
it calls the "sustenance" - means the god
Visnu. Finally (3) our "physical world"
means the Christian "God Son" it calls
the "destroyer" - means the god Siva.)
So the Christian religion already for
around 2000 years, as well as some
other religions for even much longer,
see in the universe three main components
which present human science managed
to recognise only in modern days on
the example of computers. After all,
only in modern computers we learned
to also distinguish (1) "hardware", from
(2) "software", and from (3) "peripherals".
Regrettably, modern scientists still
refuse to recognize, or at least to
notice, the presence of these three
components e.g. in people or in
animals. Means the official science
refuses to recognise such components
of every living creature as (1) "spirit",
(2) "soul", and (3) "body".
(1c)
"God always existed". (Ps 45:7)
The model described here states
exactly the same as religions do,
namely that "God existed since
eternity". Only that the model
makes this statement even more
clear and unambiguous. This is
because it informs that for eternity
existed this component of God,
which is called "God Father" or
the "Ancient of Days" by
Christianity and which is
called the "liquid (universal)
computer" or the "gigantic droplet
of counter-matter" by the Concept
of Dipolar Gravity.
(1d)
"God created the world and man".
This in turn means, that before the
creation of the world and man God
was incomplete - he had NO the part
which was created later. In turn such
an incompleteness means, that God
learns, develops, and gets more
perfect as time elapses. In turn his
learning and development means that
there was a time when God had no
knowledge yet that is required for
God, means that when his self-evolution
as God was started.
(2)
The existence of words and definition
in the ULT language, which confirm the
correctness of the explanation provided
previously. In spite that our
thinking habits block us from accepting
the fact that something (e.g. the universe)
exists since infinitively long time
and had no beginnings not end, on the
level of our intuition - which utilizes
definitions and words from the ULT
language, such an infinitive existence
of the universe is easily acceptable.
In a similar manner our intuition accepts
also other infinitive concepts, such as
infinitive love, infinitive existence
of our soul, or the possibility of
infinitively long life after people
overcome the deaths. So in order to
understand the fact of infinitively
long existence of the universe together
with this initial gigantic droplet of
counter-matter, we need to resort to
our imagination with our intuition,
means to definitions contained in the
ULT language.
(3)
The existence of the evidence which indicates
that God continually improves himself and the
entire universe. In turn if God continually
improves himself, this means, that there must
be such a moment in time, when his knowledge
was near zero, means when still there was NO
this component of God which increases his
knowledge. In turn the fact that God continually
increases his knowledge is indicated by a whole
range of evidence. Some examples of this
evidence include, amongst others:
(3a)
The structure of "timespace".
This structure is so designed, that
God can continually re-program it.
This in turn means, that God continually
learns - means that his knowledge
does NOT remain on the same level
all the time. In turn when he learns,
he introduces subsequent improvements
to the "timespace". (This "timespace"
is described more comprehensively on
web pages about
time vehicles
and about the
theory of everything
called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity.
(3b)
The manner on which God shaped the
physical world. This manner
indicates that the intention of
God was continuous improvement of
this world. Only the need for such
improvement justifies why in the
physical world there are such
things as suffering, illnesses,
death, evil,
devilish UFOnauts, etc.
(3c)
The fact that every truth needs to
break through the sea of false.
In this way God tests the value of
this truth. In turn the only reason
which logically explains the need
of carrying out an infinitive number
of such tests, is the requirement of
learning and increasing the knowledge.
(3d)
The imposing the need for improvement
onto the imperfection of man. God
created a highly imperfect man. But he
could create a perfect man. This means
that the imperfection of man contains
a requirement of continuous improvement
and learning being imposed onto it.
(3e)
The need of learning and perfecting may
be for God a condition of his survival.
After all, on our level of knowledge it
is not known whether in the huge emptiness
of the universe do NOT exist similar although
different gigantic droplets of counter-matter
which also generated superior beings analogous
to our God. So it cannot be excluded that a
situation may raise, when our God will be
confronted with one of such beings.
(4)
The existence of a body of evidence which directly
confirms the infinitive existence of the "gigantic
droplet of counter-matter suspended in infinitive
empty space". Here are most commonly known
examples of such evidence:
(4a)
The symbol if infinity (i.e. digit eight in a
horizontal position). As this is explained
in item #D6 of a separate web page about
telepathy,
our civilization repetitively receives telepathic
messages from other totaliztic civilizations of
a higher from people level of technical advancement.
In old times such messages used to be called
"divine revelations", while in present times
these are called "automatic writings" or
"messages from contactees". In these messages
humanity receives knowledge, which on our low
level of advancement humanity still is unable
to work out just be itself. One amongst such
information send to us in a telepathic manner,
was the information about the infinity of
the universe, and also the symbol of infinity.
This symbol turns out to be a "lying digit eight".
As every person is able to verify it easily,
this symbol models trajectories along which
the circulation of information (e.g. the circulation
of natural programs) must take place inside
of such a finite "gigantic droplet of
counter-matter" that hovers within the infinitive
emptiness of the universe and subdivided into
the physical world and the counter-world. On
the other hand, if this "gigantic droplet of
counter-matter" has a shape that differs from
a kind of gigantic droplet of finite dimensions,
for example it has spread infinitively and
had no end, then the symbol of infinity would
also be different - for example would take a
forms of lying X letter instead of the lying
digit eight.
(4b)
The "Ancient of Days" from the Christian religion.
In the Christian tradition, for example
in the Bible, an information is recorded
that one only component of God existed
infinitively long. The most correct name
of this component translated into English
as the "Ancient of Days". References to
to this component are, amongst others, in
the Bible - see Daniel 7:9, 7:13, and 7:22.
But more exact interpretations of this
component of God require other old-Christian
sources to be researched, for example old
psalms from Presbyterian Church. These more
exact interpretations of the name the "Ancient
of Days" for the "infinitively old droplet
of counter-matter" are presented in subsection
S5 from volume 14 of monograph
[1/4].
(5)
The existence in the model described before
a similar number of elements of infinity,
as are also contained in every other explanation
for the problem of origins of the world and man
that are known to humanity.
Whatever explanation for the origins of universe
one would consider, always it is going to have
the same problem of "what was before it".
Also always some point of this explanation
must suggest the "infinity". Such a problem
appears immediately if someone carefully
analyses e.g. the imprecise religious
explanation that "always there was God"
(but not explaining which exactly component
of God did existed since infinity). After
all, without the acceptance of infinity
immediately a question emerges of the type
"did this infinitively existing God had
always the entire knowledge that He has
since the very beginning", "if God existed
since eternity, then why He needed to
create the physical world and man, instead
these also had to exist infinitively",
"if God created man, why He did it so
relatively recent", "what God was doing
before He created the physical world and
people", etc., etc. It is also going to be
like this in case of the claims of present
Earth's science, that at the very beginning
was a "Big Bang". After all, also then
inquisitive people are going to ask questions
of the type "what was before the Big Bang",
"what caused the Big Bang", "where this
entire energy and mass of the Big Bang came
from", "what lies behind borders of the
expanding Universe", "why each one out
of supposed "evidence" for the Big Bang
can also be interpreted as an evidence
for the self-evolution of God", etc., etc.
Therefore, the inability to accept an
infinitive existence of the "gigantic
droplet of counter-matter" boils down
to the revealing exactly the same thinking
habits, which in other people generate
the inability to accept an infinitive
existence of readily-formed God, or
impossibility to accept the Big Bang.
In fact, whatever someone would postulate
that something existed infinitively long,
always these people whose minds are working
exclusively in categories of trivial
habits of finite physical world, try
to undermine his statement by asking
"but what created this something that
existed from the very beginning".
Therefore the key for finding an
explanation for the origins of the
physical world and man, that is
holding truth, is NOT the avoidance
of considering a form of infinity
in this explanation. The considering
of infinity cannot be avoided. After
all, infinity is a component and a
true reality of the universe. So the
key is to find such a scenario and model,
which contains an infinity in itself,
but which simultaneously has the highest
probability of taking place in practice,
and the correctness of which is supported
by the greatest number of evidence.
(6)
The scenario and model described
previously in item #B1 has the highest probability
to take place in reality.
If one considers all possible
scenarios and models of the creation
of world and man which include
infinity inside of themselves, then
some amongst them are going to have
greater chances of being true from
others. These more correct must display
two attributes, namely (1) they must
be supported by the greatest number
of evidence, and (2) they must have
the highest probability of occurring
in reality. In fact the scenario and
model of origins of physical world
and man described in this part of
the web page is supported by the
highest number of items of evidence.
It also is the most agreeable with
the known principles of the operation
of universe. Thus this scenario and
model has the highest probability of
taking place in reality out of all
scenarios known to humanity so-far.
#B4.
Why
God
created firstly the physical
world and then the man:
The chief goal of God is to increase his
own knowledge and to cause the continuous
development of the universe to ever more
perfect form. But no development is possible
if whatever is to be developed does not
interact with something different. So in
order to increase his own knowledge, and
to cause the development of the universe,
God decided to create something that is
completely different from himself. This
something that God created was the
physical world in which we live, and
also intelligent beings which inhabit
this physical world - means us, people.
After the creation of the physical world
and people, God can now increase his
knowledge through carrying out on us various
experiments and then watching what happens
in the result of these experiments.
Of course, while creating the physical
world and humans, God still remembered
his unpleasant experience from the past.
After all, at the beginning of his
existence he was forced to fight for the
domination over the universe with a similar
to him perfect and timeless spiritual
beings. Therefore God decided to design
us and our world in such a manner, that
we fulfil several requirements that He
imposed onto his creation. Some of these
requirements included:
(1)
Imperfection and unreliability.
In order to maintain his superiority
and advantage over us and over our
world, God created our world and us
as imperfect and unreliable.
(2)
Of a limited lifespan. Means our
time is predefined and limited.
Motto:
"Absolutely everything in the entire universe is only a manifestation
of intelligent counter-matter and natural programs which reside in this
counter-matter and which control behaviours of it" - means, as it is
stated in Hebrews 11:3 from the Bible: "what can be seen was made
out of what cannot be seen".
In order to create the physical world and man,
God completed 6-phases long process of
creation, which briefly is described in the Bible
(see the Book of Genesis, 1:1-31).
Unfortunately, the biblical description of the
process of creation uses a very archaic
language, and also is very brief. For example,
in times when it was written, by the word
"earth" was understood both the "chemical
elements" as well as "soil". In turn the world
"water" was then describing the extraordinary
liquid from the counter-world, which the
theory of everything
called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
calls the "counter-matter", as well as
the real water from our physical world.
In the biblical descriptions the same
words are used in various sentences in
such drastically different meanings.
Therefore, in order to really understand
how the creation of the physical world
and man was carried out by God, it is
necessary to translate biblical descriptions
into the present scientific terminology.
This translation is published on the
abovementioned web page about the
theory of everything
called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
(see there "part #I"). But because the
reader may not have an access to this
separate web page, repeated below are
most vital descriptions from it. So
here are the subsequent phases of this
six-stage process of the creation of
physical world and the evolution of
humans - if these phases are described
with the use of present terminology.
(1)
The creation of the earth and light.
The first phase of the creation of our
physical world that fulfils the requirements
and conditions described in previous item
#B3, required development of natural
programs which transformed liquid
counter-matter from the counter-world
into solid matter from our world.
Counter-matter is an intelligent everlasting
liquid, which exists infinitively long, and
which is in perpetual motion. So it was
necessary to so transform this counter-matter,
that it would displays attributes which
are exactly opposite to natural attributes
of this extraordinary liquid. Therefore
these natural programs which God then
developed, needed to cause such behaviour
of counter-matter, that attributes of this
liquid were reversed into exactly opposite.
The effect of reversing of attributes of
counter-matter God accomplished through
such re-programming it, that it formed
two opposite kinds of semi-permanent
whirls. These whirls are described
under the names of "low-pressure whirls"
and "high-pressure whirls" on separate
web pages about
hurricanes and about
tornados,
as well as in subsection H4.2 from volume
4 of monograph
[1/4].
Due to such a reprogramming, the continually
moving counter-matter formed semi-permanent
objects in the form of such whirls. In turn
from these whirls controlled by such natural
programs, liquid counter-matter which obeyed
these programs formed semi-permanent "objects"
representing
all chemical elements (means
"earth" - as in old terminology these elements
were called), and also
software "objects"
which represented all basic phenomena of
the physical world (means - mainly various
kinds of electromagnetic radiation, or
"light"). Thus "earth" and "light" were
formed from such natural programs and
from counter-matter which implemented
commands contained in these programs.
These "objects" are simply natural programs
and appropriate clusters of whirls of
liquid counter-matter which implement
the content of these programs. Their
description is provided, amongst others,
in item #G4 on the web page about the theory of everything
called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
and also on a separate web page about
time vehicles,
where these objects are explained as basic components
of the so-called "space time". In general, these
"objects" can be compared to objects from
present OOP (i.e. "Object-Oriented Programming"),
e.g. to an object of a "button" which appears
on the screen of our computer. This is because
these "objects" are very similar to such computer
images (e.g. the image of a "button"). For example,
on a computer screen such a "button" look as
if it is a solid form, on which one can implement
various manipulations, e.g. can shift it into a different
area of the screen, change colour of it, enlarge
or shrink it, etc. But in reality this button is still
a program and an image formed by this program
with the computer's hardware. Similarly these
"objects" formed from natural programs contained
in counter-matter, and from images formed by
hardware of this counter-matter, also look as if
the are solid, they can be subjected to manipulation
and shifting, etc.
(2)
The creation of a dome which divides two fluids (waters).
After God created the semi-permanent matter and
basic physical phenomena of the physical world
from whirls of liquid counter-matter, God decided
to separate this matter and these physical
phenomena, from counter-matter and from phenomena
of the counter-world. He accomplished this
separation through placing the matter and
physical phenomena inside of a completely
separate world. In this way God created
then an entire "physical world" - which
the Christian religion calls
God Son.
(This is a very accurate name, considering that
this religion calls "God Father" the counter-world,
while it calls "Holy Ghost" the natural program of
the so-called "universal intellect" that evolved
inside of the "virtual world". This virtual world
is simply the "program storing" capability of
counter-matter.) Then God created an impenetrable
barrier which separates this physical
world from the counter-world. Through this barrier
almost nothing can pass, apart from these natural
programs that reside in the counter-matter.
Although in the description provided here this
second phase of the creation of the physical
world may appear to be a simple and easy,
in fact it required the carrying out the complete
reconfiguration of the counter-world. After all,
every object from the physical world received
then its counter-material duplicate in the counter-world.
Furthermore, the maintaining of the existence
of this impenetrable barrier between both worlds,
and also the software communication through
this barrier, required the preparation of a huge
amount of indescribably complex software,
which maintains the cooperation of both worlds
while physically separating them from each other.
(3)
The clarification of lands and seas and the evolution of plants.
After the separation and enveloping the physical world
with the use of appropriate software, God began to
define, using a different kind of software, the subsequent
laws that prevail in this physical world. These laws gradually
allowed God to subdivide matter into different consistencies
of gases, liquids, and solid matter, separate these
kinds of matter from each other, and also begun
to experiment with creating first living organisms -
which by the nature of things needed to belong
to plants during that phase of creation.
(4)
The creation of stars and planets.
After the laws established by God for the physical
world were programmed out and tested, God
decided to enlarge and extend the developed
then (small) prototype of the physical world.
This enlargement and extension depended
on the creation of an entire present physical
world and the entire "time space". In this way
the volume of the entire universe was formed,
which included all stars, galaxies, planets, etc.
(5)
The creation and evolution of living beings in seas.
After the basic principles of work and development
of plants were mastered, God began to gradually
introduce and evolve various animals. At the
beginning he did it mainly within waters of oceans.
(6)
The creation and evolution of land animals and a gradual
creation of human beings. After all details
of genetic codes and principles of evolution were
programmed and tested, God finally could
proceed with gradual development of increasingly
more perfect land animals. In the final stage he
could also evolve human beings. How he accomplished
the evolution of humans it is explained in further
parts of this web page about the
evolution of man.
It is worth to notice, that
God
accumulated in man that he created the
essence of an entire experience from the
process of God's own evolution. For example,
a human child immediately after the birth is like
a self-programming, intelligent counter-matter
was in times before God evolved in it. After
all, a child is like an empty, self-programming
computer. Only the later life of this child
is to program into it the knowledge of an adult human.
In turn the mutual contradiction between the
persuading people by their numerous feelings,
to do whatever later is going to turn bad for
them, and simultaneous logical letting them
know by their organ of conscience what later
turns out to be good for them, is a memory written
into people and expressing the fight between good and
numerous forms of evil, which (the fight) at the very
beginning of his existence God was forced to
complete with other intellects similar to him
that also evolved in the counter-matter almost
simultaneously with God. In turn the principle
that "ontogenesis repeats the filogenesis' way",
(i.e. that the "development of an individual
repeats the development of the entire specie") -
described in item #F2 (5) of this web page about the
intelligently controlled by God creation of humans,
is an illustrative demonstration to people of the
entire history of their species.
(7)
Rest? Although the Bible calls "resting" the
present, seventh phase of the creation of the
physical world, in fact God all the time is perfecting
his creation. This perfecting is possible, because
the software of the so-called "time space"
(described amongst others in item #G4 on the web page about the
theory of everything
called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity)
was so wisely accomplished by him, that it
allows to introduce continuous improvements
to practically everything that God wishes to improve.
In turn, after any such an improvements is introduced,
immediately the power of this improvement
is extended to the entire "time space". On the
basis of watching what happens in the universe
and on the Earth, I am reasoning that God
currently experiments with a self-perfecting
organization of so-called "human swarms".
Such a "human swarm" is simply any civilization
composed of a huge number of imperfect humans
and living in separation from other similar
civilizations. "Human swarm" differs from
insect swarms or animal flocks - the advantages
of which over individual creatures God already
experimentally tested long ago. Namely, human
swarm does NOT have a "queen", while
all participants of it obtained approximately
similar characteristics and rights, and all of
them obtained the free will. The present
goal of God seem to be the development of
a system of moral and social laws, which are
going to cause that such a "human swarm"
as whole can become a creation much better
than each single member of it. (In other
words, God tries to improve the physical
world in such a manner, that these
"human swarms" which live according
to laws established by God, as whole
become much better quality in every
aspect than is each person constituting
such a swarm considered separately.)
After all, only by such a kind of experiments
various facts can be explained, e.g. a fact
that God created conditions on the Earth
in which the goodness and morality must
break free through barriers placed in front
of them by
evil doers,
or the fact that in recent times a clear drop in
level of average intelligence and average
perfection can be noticed, as it occurs both
in people and also in human
relatives from the space.
(For example, the present generation is at
average significantly less intelligent and decisively
less perfect than was in average the generation
which lived only around 50 years ago.)
I will not mention here, that this present
goal of God, as usual, runs against all
believes of Earthly scientists who claim
that "a whole is always as good as the
weakest link of it". Unfortunately, as always,
orthodox scientists who spread these kinds
of claims do not take under consideration
the experience of God in making impossible
accomplishable.
* * *
At this point it is worth to emphasise, how
incomparably more realistic is the above
"religious" description of creation of the
"physical world" and man, from a completely
absurd description of the origins of the
universe that is disseminated by present
atheistic human science. After all, e.g. the
Bible, states in Hebrews 11:3: "... the universe
was created by God's word, so that what can
be seen was made out of what cannot be seen."
Means, the Bible states that the visible "physical
world" was created from an invisible "liquid
computer" (means from the "counter-matter")
due to the use of the "program" (means the
"information" or "word") - for more details
see item #C12 on the web page
bible.htm - about the Bible authorised by God Himself.
On the other hand our official science insists
on telling us that the universe was formed from
"nothing". So if we analyse the present official
scientific explanation for the origins of the
universe, then we are to discover, that it supposed
to come to the existence in the result of a "big
bang" before which NOTHING existed. Means
before the "big bang" did NOT exist neither
mater, nor time, nor space. But after this "big
bang", from this "nothing" rapidly a whole
universe was formed. To make this absurdly
claim of science even more absurd, the same
official science overlooks that in many other
areas it tells people that from "nothing"
never can "something" be formed.
God created man in the last (sixth)
phase of the creation of physical
world. After all, in order to create
man, God had to firstly accumulate
the appropriate body of experience,
means carry out an infinitive number
of empirical experiments.
Similarly as every other fact regarding the human
history, also the place where humans were created
by God have two locations, namely (1) true, and
(2) simulated. The true place where the process
of creation of man was carried out, is the Earth.
However, for important reasons explained in
item #A2 from the beginning of this web page,
for some time now a situation is simulated - as
described in "part #J" of this web page. This
simulation tries to convince some people that
the act of creation or "evolution" of humanity
supposedly took place on the already non-existent
planet called "Terra" - located within the
Vega system in "Lute" (Polish
"Lutnia") star constellation.
(The description of this planet Terra
is provided to people by UFOnauts.
It is repeated in the Polish treatise
[3b],
and also summarised in subsection V3
from volume 16 of the English version
of monograph
[1/4].)
Then God supposedly destroyed
this planet Terra, in order to not
deprive people the free will of
speculating about their origins.
But the destruction of the planet
Terra was supposed to be carried
out only after the humanity managed
to spread around the universe,
carrying with them onto other
planets also all other vegetation
and animals that God supposedly
created earlier on Terra. According
to claims of "UFOnauts", supposedly
all intelligent beings (UFOnauts) from
the present universe supposed to be
descendants of these first people that
firstly appeared on the planet Terra.
Similarly as in the process of creation of
every other living creature, also in the
process of creation of man God used
experiences which he accumulated previously
in an empirical manner. These experiences
God had written down in the form of so-called
"genetic code" - means in a program written
in a special kind of "programming language"
which God uses for expressing details of
the life and fate of a given creature - see
item #I1 below. As this is going to be
explained in further parts of this web
page, the creation of man was carried
out by God through slight alterations
of the genetic code taken from the
water-land creatures which already existed
before man - and which we know from
mythology under the name of "sirens".
Unfortunately, this creature got extinct
completely on Earth a long time ago.
But because sirens were an improved
version of whales and dolphins, after
it got extinct on Earth the whales and
dolphins remained the only still alive
animal relatives of humans.
It is worth to notice here, that the process of
creation of man did not end on the phase number
6 described in the Bible, but lasts until today.
At this moment God implements phase 7
which is mentioned in the Bible, but to which
people usually refer as to a "rest". However, in
reality the present phase 7 of creation of man
is in fact the experimentation regarding "human
swarms". (These "human swarms" are kinds
of huge group organisms, which opposite to
insect swarms and to flocks of animals, are
composed of individuals who have the so-called
"free will" and also have the ability to think logically.)
The goal of this present experimentation of
God is to create such conditions, in which
these "human swarms" live and develop
themselves in such a manner that as a
whole each of them displays much better
qualities than the quality of every individual
member of these swarms. It is worth to notice,
that at the time when the present, 7th phase
of the creation of man finishes with a success,
God is going to initiate the 8th phase. It is to
be the transformation of best human swarms
into gods who are permitted to create their
own worlds. (In that 8th phase the human
swarms who are NOT meeting the quality
requirements imposed by God are to be
annihilated. After all, they will not be needed
any more.) Further details on this subject
are explained in item #I4 of the separate
web page about the
theory of everything
called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity.
#B7.
So who, or what, we humans actually are in the light of the
theory of everything
called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity:
Knowing how and from what we are created,
we are able to define now who, or what, we
humans actually are. So here is the definition
of us, humans, provided by the Concept of
Dipolar Gravity: "a name human is assigned
to a pyramid of natural programs which reside
in counter-matter and which shape this counter-matter
into a pyramid of structures and manifestations
that we perceive as our self-awareness, conscience,
history, body, and our sensual perceptions".
To explain this in other words, we humans,
in fact are in over 99% just kinds of natural
programs - similar like these in present computers.
Means over 99% of us is just information.
Then less than 1% of us is this continually
moving and everlasting, computer-like liquid
called "counter-matter", which these natural
programs shape into forms of various physical
structures that constitute our physical body.
The variety of these structures made of
counter-matter includes miniature toroidal
whirls described in subsection H4.2 of [1/5],
or in item #3 of the web page about
hurricanes -
several of which must cling together to compose
a single elementary particle, then it includes also
elementary particles, atoms, molecules, tissues,
etc., up until forming our entire physical body
and our senses. Illustratively we could
explain ourselves as a kind of computer
which is formed from a specially obedient
intelligent liquid, and thus which can take
any shape, any color, and any operation
that programs contained inside of it order
it to take.
The above explanation realizes to us that we in
fact are composites combined from as many as
three separate components. The first of these
components is our physical body. Because
of the close similarity between our own design and
operation, and the design and operation of present
computers, the
theory of everything
called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
compares our physical bodies to a picture which
is formed on screens of present computers - and
which can be perceived by our physical senses.
In fact, similarly as these pictures on screens of
present computers, our physical body as such
does NOT exists at all - it is just an illusion formed
in a software manner and posted to us via our
software senses. Our second component
is the counter-body which is formed from
the eternally existing and continually moving
liquid called "counter-matter". This counter-body
in fact does exist. However, it represents less
than 1% of what we really are. The main task
of it is to act as a computer memory which stores
programs of our soul.
Finally the most vital our component is the
most important natural program which stands
on the very top of this pyramid of programs that
is called a “human”. It is this program that religions
call the soul. This program contains our
self-awareness and our memory. More about
the natural program of "soul" is explained in
subsection I5.2 from volume 5 of monograph
[1/5].
Everything that does exist can be proven. Therefore
we people are able to prove that we have these
three components of ourselves listed above, i.e.
that we have: (1) a physical body, (2) a counter-body,
and (3) a soul. The proof for having the physical
body does NOT need to be shown here - it suffices
that we just "pinch" ourselves to know that our
physical senses confirm the software existence
of our body. The fact, however, that we also have
a counter-body should be proven formally. For the
appropriate proof suffices the one presented in
subsection H1.1.4 from volume 4 of monograph
[1/5],
and also in item #D3 from the web page about the Concept of Dipolar Gravity.
In turn the formal scientific proof for the existence of
eternal soul is presented in item #C1.1 from the web page about nirvana,
and also in subsection I5.2.1 from volume 5 of monograph
[1/5].
The above descriptions and explanations, but
provided from a different point of view, are also
presented in item #C1 from the web page about nirvana.
#B8.
A formal scientific proof of
totalizm
which confirms that "God created the couple of first people",
formulated according to principles of mathematical logic:
Formal scientific proofs are logical structures
which were developed according to a system
of very strict logical rules. They prove the truth
of specific theorems. These proofs turn our
believes into certainty. In the sense of their
character they are equivalents of physical
equations, only that instead of being formulated
and transformed in the form of mathematical
symbols, proofs are formulated from worded
assertions. The development of formal proofs
is extremely difficult and risky. This is because
apart from the need to fulfil rigorous logical principles
and also fulfil proving requirements, proofs additionally
carry in themselves the authority of their author
(i.e. the "prover"). So if they contain an error,
and thus someone invalidates them in a rational
(expert) manner, then this someone invalidates
also the authority of theie author (i.e. the "prover").
Therefore today such proofs are being developed
only in some areas of human knowledge, such as
mathematics or physics - where for a long time
exists a large pool of basic proofs on which further
proofs can be based.
But there are areas of human knowledge, e.g.
biology, astronomy, or religion, which so-far had
none formal proofs. So these areas
do NOT have initial pools of basic certainties,
on which further proofs could be based. Therefore,
these areas of human knowledge in fact are
composites of assumptions and speculations,
not reliable areas of science.
Nothing is known for sure in them. Also in them
officially are disseminated various outrageous,
strange, erroneous, and separated from real life
speculations of the type of the supposed "theory"
of random ("natural") evolution, or the "theory"
of pulsating universe and escaping galaxies,
or wild claims of adherers of atheism, etc., etc.
After all, everything that is claimed in these
areas, according to local tradition does NOT
require to be proved. The formulation of proofs
is especially difficult for these areas. After all,
people who are attracted to these areas,
love chaos and wild speculations, thus do
NOT wish anyone tries to introduce order
and accountability to whatever they are claiming.
The proof that I am going to present here belongs
just to these areas.
In 2007, during my
professorship at a university in South Korea,
I had a special honour, and simultaneously a special
responsibility, to develop, to publish, and to disseminate
four formal proofs, each one of which is extremely
important both, individually to each one of us, and
collectively to the entire our civilization. One of
these is the formal proof presented below for the
creation by God the first couple of people, i.e.
the first woman and the first man. This proof is
a component in a set of four similar formal proofs.
These four formal proofs include: (1) the proof
for the existence of the "counter-world" (i.e. another
world inhabited by God and by our souls) - which
(the proof) is presented in subsection H1.1.4
from volume 4 of monograph
[1/5]
and also in item #D3 from the web page about the Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
(2) the formal proof for the existence of God - presented
in subsection I3.3.4 from volume 5 of monograph
[1/5]
and also in item #B3 of the web page god.htm - about scientific replies of the secular philosophy of totalizm to basic questions about God.
(3) the formal proof from here, which proves the creation
by God of the first woman and the first man - presented
below and also in subsection I1.4.2 from volume 5 of monograph
[1/5],
and (4) the formal proof that people have
eternal souls - presented in subsection
I5.2.1 from volume 5 of monograph
[1/5]
and also in item #C1.1 of the web page about nirvana.
In the descriptions that follow a full version of
the formal proof for the creation by God of the
first couple of people is presented. But before
I formulate this proof, a few more words of this
introduction.
The formal scientific proof for the creation by God
the first woman and the first man, was developed
in initial days of October 2007, when I was on
my professorship at a university in Southern
Korea. This proof was carried out with methods
of mathematical logic. It is based on the well-known
assertion (fact), that in order a given species
of creatures can multiply further all by themselves,
they need to exist as at least two representatives
of this species, namely - in case of people, as at
least one woman and one man. (In case of other
creatures, as at least one female and one male -
e.g. one cow and one bull, one hen and one rooster,
one sow (pig) and one hog, etc., etc.) The fact of
this simultaneous creation by God as many as two
creatures from each species, is so important that
it is especially confirmed in the Bible - see the Genesis, 1:27
"So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them."
In turn the so-called "natural" (i.e. completely
random) evolution, which is promoted by present
science to explain the origins of humans, is only
able to cause a rapid appearance of a single
creature of new species, not two simultaneously.
Thus, in case of people, this "natural-random evolution"
could only cause the appearance of a single male,
or a single female, not both simultaneously. (The
probability that both would appear simultaneously
and rapidly, combined with the speed of evolutionary
changes in nature observed presently (which
is indistinguishable from zero), is so low that it
excludes any such appearance within the duration
of existence of present universe.) In turn just a
single individual would NOT be able to multiply
further just by itself. So such a "natural evolution"
in NO case could be able to give beginnings
for new species of living creatures.
So here it is, the entire formal proof for the
creation by God the first woman and the
first man, completed with the use of methods
of mathematical logic:
Theorem:
"The first woman and the first man were created by God."
Basis propositions:
(1)
Speaking just theoretically, every new species
of living creatures, including humans, could be
initiated either by the appearance of just one
such a new creature, or by the appearance of
a couple of new creatures. The fact that practically
all species of living creatures that populate the
Earth are able to multiply further by themselves
only when there exists simultaneously a couple
of them, means a male and a female, eliminates
completely the possibility that at the very beginning
could appear just a single such a new creature,
instead of the required couple, e.g. just one person
instead of a couple of people which included a man
and a woman - capable of further multiplying just
by themselves.
(2) The simultaneous appearance of a couple
of people, i.e. the first male and the first female,
could either happen in a rapid manner,
i.e. this couple of new people appeared rapidly
in its final form which differed significantly from
the nearest creatures that are related to it, or
in the smooth manner, i.e. this couple
was shaped gradually over a significant period
of time, from other creatures that are related to
it. The fact that scientists neither are able to find
any evidence for the existence of intermediate
forms between humans and other creatures
which could be close relatives of humans,
or that in present times the science was unable
to find even a single example of a full cycle of
such a smooth transformation of one species
of creatures into another species of creatures,
eliminates completely the possibility of a smooth
evolution of humans and proves conclusively that
the first couple of humans appeared on the Earth
in a "rapid manner" - i.e. rapidly and without any
intermediate forms.
(3) The first couple of people, means the first female
and the first male, either evolved randomly ("naturally"),
or this couple was created by God. The fact that
the first couple of people appeared rapidly eliminates
completely the possibility that the people originate
from a random ("natural") evolution.
(Explanation complementing this 3rd set of premises:
if the appearance of the first couple of people, means
the first woman and the first man, and also the appearance
of the first couple of any other living creatures, originates
from a "natural" (random) evolution, then it would display
the presence of a whole range of attributes, which in spite
of intense searches the human science was unable to
locate. For example, (a) it would leave traces in the form
of a whole array of the intermediate forms between the
starting species and the finishing species - while such
traces are absent on the Earth NOT only for human
beings but also for all other species of living creatures.
(b) Similar natural processes would need to
also occur in a continuous manner at present - thus
scientists would be able to find many other examples
when in recent times such an evolution of one
species into another species actually takes place -
and they would be able to document these examples
in their complete cycles of transformations. But the
science is unable to indicate even a single example
of such a full cycle of transformations of one species
into another species. Furthermore (c) such a smooth
evolution would need to have some effective propelling
mechanisms. But apart from wild speculations which
are NOT supported by any evidence, human science
is unable to prove the existence of such an effective
mechanism that propels a random evolution, nor
indicate an example (and a proof) that this mechanism
in fact does work in nature.)
Proof:
(1) The first basis proposition is to be transformed
with the use of tautological form of the method known
under the name of "disjunctive syllogism". This
form can be written as [(p || q) && !p] => q,
in which the assertion "p" says "every new
species of living creatures, including humans,
are initiated by the appearance of just one
such a new creature", while the assertion "q"
says "every new species of living creatures,
including humans, are initiated by the
appearance of a couple of such new creatures",
in turn the assertion "!p" states "the fact that practically
all species of living creatures that populate the
Earth are able to multiply further by themselves
only when there exists simultaneously a couple
of them, means a male and a female, eliminates
completely the possibility that first could appear
just a single such new creature, instead of the
entire couple, e.g. just one person instead of a
couple of people that included a man and a woman -
capable of further multiplying just by themselves".
The transformation of these propositions leads to
the conclusion that "the humans were initiated by
the simultaneous appearance of a couple of people
that included a man and a woman - capable of further
multiplying just by themselves".
(2) Accepting this previous conclusion for an assertion
in the next phase of inference, and using the method
of "disjunctive syllogism", the tautological form of which
can be written as: [(p || q) && !p] => q, we obtain a
next conclusion which states that "the first couple of
people appeared on the Earth in a "rapid manner" -
i.e. rapidly and without any intermediate forms."
(3) The last couple of propositions allows us to derive
the final conclusion also with the method called the
"disjunctive syllogism", the tautological form of which
can be written as: [(p || q) && !p] => q. In this form the
assertion "p" says "the first couple of people, i.e. the
first woman and the first man, evolved randomly ("naturally")",
while assertion "q" states "the first couple of people
was created by God". Thus the final conclusion
states "the first couple of people, i.e. the
first woman and the first man, was created by God"!
Conclusion:
The above inference chain unambiguously and conclusively
proves the truth of the theorem that "the first couple of people,
i.e. the first woman and the first man, was created by God".
* * *
For the use of these readers who are NOT
familiar with the notation that is applied in the
above proof, I would like to explain that
symbols "p", "q", and "r" mark subsequent
"assertions" utilized in this proof as logical
variables. In turn symbols "&&", "||", and "=>"
mark logical operators "and", "inclusive or",
and "implies" (if ... => then ...").
It is also worth to mention about the validity of
the above proof. Because this proof utilizes
exclusively tautological forms of subsequent
methods, it remains valid for all values of
variables it uses. Thus practically it is error-proof.
If someone would like to undermine it, he or
she would need to undermine first the validity
of mathematical logic. In turn this logic is a
foundation for countless mathematical proofs
which with a large success were used by the
effective and precise discipline of mathematics.
Thus, since so strong proof for the creation
by God of the first couple of humans, means
the first woman and the first man (and also for the
creation by God first couples of all other living
creatures) we finally were able to develop,
it introduces for us huge implications. Because
of the existence of this proof, and also three
further proofs mentioned at the beginning of
this item, it becomes really important that
everyone of us verifies his or hers attitude
towards God, other world, moral life, etc., etc.
After all, without the verifying this attitude,
we may inflict ourselves the biggest harm that
one is able to inflict himself or herself.
Especially vital in the above proof is that it is a
component of four, similar by methods used, but
different by evidence that they utilize, formal proofs
that coexist in monograph
[1/5].
These four proofs include mentioned already earlier:
(1) the proof for the existence of the so-called
"counter-world" (i.e. the world that is inhabited
by God and by our souls) - which is presented
in subsection H1.1.4 from volume 4 of that
monograph [1/5], (2) the proof for the existence
of God - presented in subsection I3.3.4 from
volume 5 of that monograph [1/5], (3) this formal
proof for the creation of the first woman and the
first man by God - presented in subsection I1.4.2
from volume 5 of that monograph [1/5], and (4)
the formal proof that people have eternal souls -
presented in subsection I5.2.1 from volume 5 of
that monograph [1/5]. These four proofs in fact
formulate the foundation stones for the entirely
new scientific discipline about another world,
God, act of creation, soul, etc. In order to illustratively
realize here to the reader the weight of the appearance
of as many as four such proofs simultaneously,
it would be good to compare ourselves to old
time Maoris that inhabited New Zealand and that
had no idea of the existence of farm animals,
such as horses or cows. (Before first Europeans
arrived to New Zealand, these islands were inhabited
mainly by birds and by lizards.) So when these Maoris
saw the first horse, probably they suspected that
it is just a mirage or a freak of nature. When
they saw two horses, they started to be puzzled
and convinced that some new quality is just
entering their lives. When they saw three horses,
they could be absolutely sure that horses do
exist and that they need to take notice of them.
In turn when they saw four horses, they needed
to revise completely their view of the world that
surrounded them. (By the way, now Maoris are
biggest appreciators of horses and they cannot
live without these animals.)
A shocking results gives also the comparison
of arguments of so-called "evolutionists" with
so-called "creationists", in the light of the above
proof (and also in the light of other formal proofs
discussed here). The evolutionists generate
in science so loud noise, as if all evidence was
in their hands. In the result of this noise, and also
hysteria that these noise created in human science,
amongst present scientists almost no-one has the
courage to admit that he or she is a "creationist".
However, if one carefully examines the supposed
"evidence" which stands behind this noise, then
it turns out that it is just this proverbial noise of
"empty pots that make the most of noise". This
is because the evolutionists actually have no
even a single documented case of so-called
"missing link" - means the intermediate evolutionary
form of any amongst millions of species of
creatures that inhabit the Earth in the process
of changing into another species. And we are
talking here not only about the "missing link"
for human beings, but also the missing links
for horses, cows, dogs, etc. After all, amongst
these millions creatures which populate the Earth
the human science is unable to indicate the
"missing link" to any of them. This means that
the pool of evidence in disposal of evolutionists
is actually equal to zero. Evolutionists also do
not have documented even a single case of
seeing a full cycle of changes of one species
into another species on the Earth. Means that
also the principle of the development of new
species which is promoted by them is wrong,
as it has no precedence in a real life. Finally
evolutionists still are unable to indicate a
mechanism that would propel the random
evolution. They speculate that supposedly in
nature is working the principle of the "survival
of fittest", but still again the empirical evidence
eliminates this survival as a mechanism that
propels the evolution. After all, there are known
cases when the oldest animals survived in the
unchanged form until today. A well-known example
of just such oldest animal that exists on the Earth
until today are trilobites which I saw myself
(with my own eyes) as they are sold today on fish
markets of Malaysia as so-called "king's crabs".
So how the "survival of the fittest" could be a propelling
mechanism of the evolution, when it allows to survive
until today even these oldest animals in spite of
"most modern competition" and in spite that they
represent the most primitive living organisms.
On the other hand creationists have on
their side the sea of evidence and confirmations.
For example, the scientific theory called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
has proven formally that God does exists, and
even indicated the space (i.e. a separate world
scientifically called the "counter-world") in which
God resides far from the reach of our prowling
eyes. Thus creationists have the intelligent creator.
The same theory indicated also the mechanisms
that propels the creation (i.e. the need of this
intelligent God to develop and to improve the universe).
Finally this theory indicated also the specific
examples of evidence which confirms the act
of creation taking place. This means that acts
of creation are confirmed practically by everything.
Thus the only reason why creationists are unheard
of in science, is that they are deafen and terrorized
by these creatures called "Pajak's serpents" - the
description of which is contained in item #D2.2
of the web page about the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity.
(Who actually are these noisy creatures that block
the progress of knowledge on the Earth, it was
explained more comprehensively in item #E2
of the web page about
evil.htm - about origins of all evil on the Earth.)
Interestingly, since the speculation about the
"natural" (random) evolution started to clearly
crumble down, these noisy creatures which
in item #D2.2 of the web page about the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
are called the serpents of Pajak immediately
come up with another atheistic explanation for
the origin of man. (Clearly the "theory of natural
evolution" also originates from these "serpents".
This is why after the fall-down of the theory of
"natural" evolution, "serpents" suggest now
another atheistic explanation which is very
similar to their previous theory.) This time
the "serpents" claim that the mankind was
intelligently designed by themselves. The
serpents call the "theory of intelligent design"
this their usurping to themselves the credit
for the creation of the mankind - that we
really own to God. Of course, this claim is
even more preposterous than their previous
claim about the "natural" (random) evolution.
If one analyses just a single aspect of the
amount of labour needed to design and to
complete these millions of creatures that
populate the Earth, then the consumption
of labour turns out to exceed capabilities of
even a largest civilization. Everyone who
had ever anything to do with the design and
with implementation of anything new, knows
jolly well how much labour, effort, thinking, and
people (i.e. staff) requires the development
of even the simplest thing, e.g. just an ordinary
toothbrush. (And still every now and again it
turns out that this toothbrush is imperfect yet
and that it can be improved further.) Thus for
every person who is familiar with the labour
of any creation, the claim that some civilization
would be able to develop ideally millions of
living creatures that populate the Earth, is simply
an ignorant bundle of nonsense. And one needs
to remember that every single one out of these
millions of creatures from the Earth is incomparably more
complex than a toothbrush. Also each single one of
them is developed perfectly for their role on Earth.
Thus the gigantic task of creation of new life on the
Earth could be only met by the being of efficiency
and capabilities of God himself. In no circumstances
it could be completed by lazy cosmic bandits and
robbers that practice the philosophy of
parasitism,
which actually are UFOnauts (i.e. "serpents of Pajak").
I will not even elaborate here about the fact that if these
atheistic "serpents of Pajak" (UFOnauts) designed
and implemented creatures that populate the Earth,
then who in such case would design and implement
them - means these serpents? In turn if we accept
that it was God who developed serpents and other
living creatures of the universe, then it is obvious
that God does NOT need assistance of these
clumsy and mischievous serpents in perfecting
also humans from the Earth.
At this point I would like to appeal to other lecturers
of logic. Namely, I propose to take notice of the
lack of meaning, motivation, and the absence
of engagement in examples of proofs presented
in textbooks of logic - as an example consider
the textbook proof "modus ponens" of the kind,
quote: "Samson is strong", and "If Samson
is strong, then it will take a woman to do
him in." We can conclude "It will take a
woman to do Samson in." (End of quote.)
So instead we use in our lectures such
examples deprived of actuality and sense,
I would rather suggest to use for example
of proofs e.g. the proof explained above, or
other proofs indicated in this item. After all,
these proofs are to inspire students to thinking
and to searches for truth, give more sense to
their lives, will be agreeable with indications
of our conscience, and in a non-imposing
manner are going to add our own contribution
to the fight for the prevalence of truth.
Independently from subsections of the monograph
[1/5]
indicated before, and also independently of this
web page, further formal scientific proofs similar
to this one, are also presented on other web pages
of totalizm. And so, the formal proof (1)
the formal proof stating that "the counter-world
does exist" (this "counter-world" is actually
another world existing parallel to our "physical
world" and it is filled with the continually moving
substance called "counter-matter" which displays
attributes of liquid computer hardware) -
is presented in item #D3 of the web page about the
dipolar_gravity.htm - about the Concept of Dipolar Gravity
and also in subsection H1.1.4 from volume 4 of my
newest monograph marked
"[1/5]".
In turn the formal proof (2) stating that
"God does exist" also completed with
the use of methods of mathematical logic, is
presented in item #B3 of a separate web page
god.htm - about scientific replies of the secular philosophy of totalizm to basic questions about God
and also in subsection I3.3.4 from volume 5
of my newest monograph marked
"[1/5]".
The proof (3) from this web page,
stating that "God created the first pair
of people" - is presented not only in
this item #B8 of this web page named
"evolution.htm",
but also in subsection I1.4.2 from volume
5 of the monograph marked
"[8/2]".
The formal proof (4) stating that
"people have eternal souls" is
presented in item #C1.1 of the web page
nirvana.htm
and also in subsection I5.2.1 from
volume 5 of the monograph marked
"[1/5]".
The proof (5) stating "DNA are
most simple forms of natural computers which
control the passage through time of cells in
which these DNA reside, while this control
of the passage of cells through time they
accomplish by a sequential running of
software 'programs of life and fate' contained
in memories of these DNA" - is presented
in item #D7 of the web page named
"immortality.htm"
and also in subsection M1.6 from volume 11 of monograph marked
"[1/5]".
Finally the formal proof (6) stating
that "God authorised the Bible" - is
presented in item #B1 of the web page named
"bible.htm"
and also in subsection M7.1 from volume 11 of the monograph marked
"[1/5]".
#B9.
In fact there was no "natural evolution" at all - there was only the "completion of ecosystem" by God:
Motto:
"The oldest creatures are equally perfect as the newest creatures - this definitively contradicts a natural evolution."
On a separate web page about the
authorization of the Bible by God himself,
in items #F1 and #F2 is listed a long
specification of items of scientific evidence
for the existence of God, soul, another world, etc.
Representatives of physical and biological
sciences conceal this huge body of evidence
from the society. In this manner they deprive
people the opportunity to make an "informed
decision" regarding their relation with God.
One amongst such carefully concealed cases
of evidence for the existence of God that is
discussed on that web page, is the empirically
striking us fact that the oldest creatures
(animals) on Earth are equally perfect
and equally well adjusted to present conditions,
as the newest creatures (animals).
Examples of such oldest creatures, which organisms
are equally perfect as organisms of most recent
creatures, are "trilobites". Trilobites belong actually
to the oldest creatures on Earth. But they still live
until today in sea waters of Malaysia. In Malaysia
these are eaten as so-called "kings crabs". In spite
of their impressive age, their organisms are equally
perfect as organisms of the newest creatures.
A similar case is with lizards and crocodiles, and
also with sharks. In spite of their impressive age,
their organisms are equally perfect as organisms
of most recent creatures.
According to the model of evolution, creatures
most recent should be significantly more perfect
than these oldest creatures. But according to
the model of creation of creatures by God, all
creatures were created in their perfect form.
After all, in case of creation the chronology
of their appearing in the physical world depends
only on the function that according to the God's
will they are to perform in the entire ecosystem.
Thus the fact that organisms of the oldest creatures
are equally perfect as organisms of the most recent
creatures, proves that in fact there was never
such thing which the science to-date describes
under the name of "natural evolution".
In this way the existing evidence indicates that
in reality the "natural evolution" never took place.
In fact, what science incorrectly interprets as a
"natural evolution", in reality was only a completion
of the ecosystem by God. God simply
completed the ecosystem gradually. Initially
He created only these most needed creatures,
then creatures less required. Some creatures,
e.g. "dinosaurs", God introduced only temporary,
then replacing their role with a whole range of
other creatures, while eliminating dinosaurs.
In His completion of the ecosystem God
acted similarly as young owners of new flats
complete their furniture. I.e. since they are
unable to introduce everything at once,
they firstly introduce whatever is the most
important. Then gradually add the equipment.
Some items of furniture they introduce only
temporary - only till the time when they are
able to replace it with a series of other items
which are more specialized.
#B10.
God works silently and invisibly - but we can see effects of His work:
The wind is invisible. So is God. Since we
can't see this God, the claims are made that
He doesn't exist. Then the same people should
say that neither does the wind exist. But we
know the wind does exist, because of the effect
it has on things (smoke for instance). Likewise,
the God exists and works because of His effect
on things, such as bringing into existence very
complex life forms, things which nature has never
been able to produce by just random chance.
#B11.
Summary of the "true history of the universe and the humanity":
The "real history of the universe and the humanity"
is the one for which most vital facts are described
in the Bible. Unfortunately, the main role of
the Bible is to provide people with only the
most fundamental information, and thus inspiring
people to carry out their own research that would
extend this information. Therefore the Bible
does NOT reveal the whole "real history of
the universe and the humanity", but only some
key points of it. This is because God expects
that the remaining sections of this history people
will find out on their own through research.
Therefore the relatively new scientific
theory of everything
called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
worked out some amongst these missing sections
of the "real history of the universe and the humanity".
These sections were published, amongst others,
on this web page. Let us remind ourselves most
key points of this true history.
(0) The infinitively long existence of self-learning
"counter-matter". Counter-matter displays
attributes of a "liquid computer". Means, attributes
of this substance are exact reversals of attributes
of matter which we already know so well. Counter-matter
exists infinitively long. But only relatively recent,
just on itself, it evolved in its memory the self-aware
natural program which we popularly call "God". The
evolution of this program finished only slightly over
6000 years ago. More on this subject is presented
in items #B1 to #B3 of this web page.
(1) The self-evolution of God. The course and
effects of this self-evolution of God were determined
through analyses carried out by the Concept of Dipolar
Gravity. Their descriptions are provided in item #B1
of this web page. This self-evolution of God was
completed slightly over 6 thousand years ago, when
our God accomplished (developed) its own self-awareness.
(2) The creation by God the physical world, living
creatures, and humans. It is described by the
Bible. The interpretation of this biblical descriptions,
carried out according to findings of the Concept of
Dipolar Gravity, was published in items #B5 and #B6
of this web page. According to data provided in the
Bible, this creation took place around 6 thousands
years ago.
(3) Period of the open coexistence of God and humans.
In the first period of around 1000 years after the
creation of the physical world and people, God linked
His own mind to human-like bodies that He temporally
simulated on the Earth. (These simulations were
carried out on principles identical to these with which
presently God simulates UFOnauts and UFOs - means
on principles described in item #J1 of this web page.)
In this way God could interact with people directly and
teach them the basic principles of living. Descriptions
of these times survived until today in the form of
mythology and sparse descriptions from holy books.
It is from these times that various mythologies originate,
e.g. Egyptian, Greek, or Roman, as well as texts from
the Biblical Old Testament.
(4) The giving of religions and holy books to people.
Because direct interaction of God with people turned
out to be impractical and creating undesirable effects,
around 5000 years ago God ceased to influence
people openly. But in order to still provide people with
a set of most vital rules of living, God decided to create
what presently we call "religions". Probably the oldest
religion that God created, was what we presently call
"Hinduism". On the occasion of creating Hinduism God
gave people also a written form of hugely voluminous
guidelines and fundamental information - which
with the elapse of time formed these numerous
"holy books" of Hinduism. But it turned out that
people do NOT use these holy books because
of their too-voluminous size. Thus practically only
very few people read them. In the result God decided
to give to people further religions for which holy books
were increasingly shorter and more condensed.
One amongst these religions was the Christianity,
the holy book of which (i.e.
the Bible)
turned out to be the most perfect holy book
authorised by God Himself.
(5) The inspiring in people the development of increasingly
more perfect social systems, and also the development
of culture, science, and technology. This inspiring
boiled down to forming amongst people a whole series
of increasingly more perfect social systems, starting
from (1) tribal communities, through (2) slavery, (3)
feudalism, (4) capitalism, until the present form of (5)
socialism, and the future forms of (6)
totaliztic systems.
Simultaneously God inspired in people the development
of culture, science, and technology. This stage of the
history of humanity lasts until today and is going to
continue.
Part #C:
Evidence which confirms that the universe and
man were created by God:
#C1.
Which evidence confirms that
the man was purposely created by
God,
and that God uses the "intelligently
controlled evolution" in order to
continually improve the universe:
For the fact that not only people, but also God
utilizes the process of gradual improvement
(means the "evolution") in His continuous
effort of forming the increasingly more perfect
universe, is indicated by the ever growing
body of evidence. Let us review now some
more significant examples from this evidence:
(1)
The symmetry of the universe - means the use by
God the same methods of action which with the
elapse of time people will also develop for their own use.
The universe is very symmetrical on many different
ways. One of the manifestations of this symmetry is
that when a method produces the desired outcomes
in one discipline, the same method will turn also
equally productive in a related discipline. Scientists
are benefiting the most from this manifestation of the
symmetry of the universe. It allows them to shift and
adapt most effective methods of action from one
discipline to another. In spite however, that people
benefit from the outcomes of this symmetry since
a long time, they still insist to not recognize that God
also utilizes the same methods of action that they
use (or more strictly, that these are them who mimic
in their actions the methods which were developed
and used by God since long time ago).
(2)
Such a pre-programming of all laws of the universe,
that they guarantee almost a continuous development,
improvement, and evolution of practically everything.
For example, let us consider the principle of natural
selection prevailing in jungles, which amongst others causes
that the fittest survives. If one analyses this principle
thoroughly, it was introduced on purpose by some
superior intellect in order to promote the health
amongst animals. After all, if it would be formed
by the nature itself, then it would take the form of
the "survival of the most intelligent", or the "survival
of the most hansom" - means the one who enjoys
the biggest favours from the opposite sex.
(3)
The existence of genetic code. The sole fact that
there is such thing as a genetic code, is also a very
powerful evidence in support of the fact, that behind
the process of gradual evolution some superior
intelligence stands, means stands what we call
God.
This is because from the theory of communication
we know, that the formation of any code is
only possible if there is an intelligence which
developed it and uses it. Expressing this
in other words, behind every code must stand
some sort of intelligence. It is impossible to
develop a code, if there is no intelligence
which participated in the development of it. Since
there is such thing as a genetic code, this also
means that there is an intelligence which
created and uses this code. Because the genetic
code appears and is used in practically all
living creatures, this intelligence which created
it must represent someone who is superior to
all living creatures. Means, it must represent
the universal intellect which we call God.
At this point it is also worth to notice, that
the existence of genetic code is both, the
evidence for the existence of God,
as well as the evidence for the use of evolution
by this God as a basic tool of improvements
of the living part of the universe. After all, because
of the genetic code, God in a very simple way
is able to program the evolutionary improvements
and the development of new species. It is
enough that God makes intelligent changes
in this genetic code, while the evolution of
given species is going to follow the improvements
that God pre-programmed and expressed with
the use of this code.
(4)
The presence of genes in genetic codes of some creatures,
which document the formation of these codes in a similar
manner as human programmers prepare new programs.
When a human programmer generates a new program,
usually he does it in such a manner, that he takes an
old program which does a similar job, and adopts it to
a new task. In the result, sometimes such an adopted
program contains a sequence of code which is not
needed in the new application of it. As it turns out, God
sometimes does the same during the creation of new
species. In order to create them, He takes a genetic
code of an already existing creature, then He adopts
this code for performing a new task. In the result,
American researchers who analyze the genetic code
for the creature called the California purple sea urchin,
with the scientific name "Strogylocentrotus purpuratus",
discovered with a shock, that this primitive creature
shares over 7000 genes with humans. These include
genes that help people see, as well as genes for
the human sense of smell (what this sea creature
needs the smell for?). It practically means,
that this completely dissimilar to people sea urchin,
in the genetic sense shows a significant proportion
of similarity with humans. So far scientists assigned
only to monkeys so significant similarity to humans -
for details see item #H2 in the further part of this web
page. More information about this genetically similar
to people sea creature, is provided in the article
"Secret life of sea urchin reveals intriguing mystery"
from page A19 of New Zealand newspaper
"The New Zealand Herald",
issue dated on Wednesday, November 15, 2006.
(This article is based on a scientific article from
the issue of the Journal "Science" which proceeded
it most closely.)
(5)
The existence of moral field and conscience.
These are described on a separate web page about
totalizm.
In fact their existence and operation completely
contradicts the natural (random) evolution.
After all, conscience and moral field for
example forbids to kill and to cheat, means
makes more difficult the "survival of physically
fittest". As an example consider how conscience
could help, e.g. lions, in their survival.
Unless it supposed to turn them into grass-eaters.
One should realize here, that animals in
fact also do have conscience at a level of
small children. In past I had a highly
sympathetic cat named Teecee - the photograph
of it is shown on the web page about
bandits amongst us.
The cat's nature of my Teecee always tempted
him to steal food that a neighbour put out
for his cats. I always was telling off Teecee
for stealing this food (although I never
punished him physically for it), because
whatever the neighbour put out, usually
was not very clean, full
of flies, and
partially rotting. So I was afraid
that Teecee gets some disease from
this food. Teecee knew that he NOT supposed
to steal this food, but somehow he never was
able to resist the temptation of trying it.
But each time when he did this, after the
return to home with his appearance and
behaviour he displayed such enormous feeling
of guilt, that the only thing that was
equal to his conduct then was the appearance
and behaviour of small children which not
only ate all sweets that they were told
to NOT touch before a dinner, but in addition
they broke the vase in which these sweets
were stored.
(6)
The existence of the ULT language. This
language is not only a proof for the existence
of God - as without God it would NOT be able
to eventuate just on its own. It is also a proof
for the purposeful creation of man by God - as
in a purely accidental manner it would NOT be
able to be formed in our minds just by itself."
(For more data regarding the ULT language -
see item #B4 of the separate web page about
telepathy.)
(7)
Unimaginably higher structural complexity of
the human body in comparison to the structural
simplicity of the natural program of God,
combined with the higher chance of evolution
of the simpler structure first. The best
proof of the incomparably higher structural
complexity of living organisms - including
human body, in comparison to the simplicity
of programs, is that almost every scientist
currently is
able to form programs. However,
there is NO scientist on Earth who would
be able to synthesize from zero even a
simplest living organism. In turn this huge
difference in structural complexity of living
organisms in comparison to the natural program
of God, means that since there was in the
universe such thing as a natural evolution,
the outcome of it needed to firstly be the
structurally simpler God, not the unimaginably
complex man. (Of course, the natural evolution
must occur in the universe, otherwise it would
NOT have the definition in the ULT language,
while people would NOT be able to invent it
just on their own.) In turn, since God once
eventuated, nothing in the entire universe
could happen without his participation and
will. Means, in case of the existence of
God, man had no right to evolve on its
own and just by a pure coincident - means
without the approval and intentional
action of this God.
* * *
Of course, to the evidence discussed here also
facts belong which were presented in
item #D7 of this web page. For example, belongs
here rather allegorical than literal significance
of biblical descriptions of the creation of mankind,
and also belongs the fact that laws of the universe
limit and shape the actions of everyone in the
same way - no matter who this everyone is.
#C2.
Which evidence confirms that the physical
world was really created by God:
In reality there exists an immensely large
body of evidence which confirms that
the physical world was created by God.
Of course, the presentation of this huge
amount of evidence would exceed the
humble size of this web page. Therefore
here I am only going to indicate the most
meaningful examples of it. Here these are:
(1) Evidence and proofs that God really does exist
and that He controls the fate of the physical world.
These evidence and proofs are presented, amongst
others, on the internet web page
god_proof.htm - about scientific evidence for the existence of God.
One amongst such evidence and proofs is this formal
scientific proof that God really created the first couple
of people, i.e. the first man and the first woman - which
(the proof) is presented in item #B8 above.
(2) The software (reversible) nature of time which prevails
in the physical world. Time could NOT be reversible
and have software nature if it was NOT formed that way
by intelligent God. In turn an empirical proof (accessible
for everyone) that time has a software nature and passes
in short jumps, is described in item #D2 of the web page
immortality.htm - about the access of people to immortality and to lives that never end.
#C3.
How the
theory of everything named the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
adds its own findings about the
fact of the creation of man by
God:
Previously the fact of the creation
of man by God was postulated only by
religions. All what science would do,
is to contradict it. Science was unable
to find and to indicate evidence in
support of the process of creation.
In turn without knowing such evidence,
scientists believed that they have
a duty to stand "against" the creation
of man. (In spite that they also
had no clear evidence on the
impossibility of the creation of man.)
Initially against the claims of
religions about the creation of man
stand up only the Darwin's Theory
of Natural Evolution. Sarcastically
it was a "theory" only from a name.
After all, the data on which it was
based were collected in a single
small area. So the "evidence" that
it used was taken out of the context.
For a significant period of time
this "pseudo-theory" was all that
the official human science managed
to sweat out about the origins
of man. So it generated a lot of
bad air. After all, it practically
instigated the entire human science
and almost all human scientists
to stand "contra" towards statements
of religions. But starting from
1985 a different scientific theory
named the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
started to be disseminated. This different
theory also have its own findings
regarding the origins of the physical
world and origins of man. This time the
the findings of this other theory are
"pro" - means they reveal that man
was really created by God. So there
is a chance, that this theory of
dipolar gravity manages to repair at
least a part of the ocean of evil
that the Darwin theory generated.
So the situation on the present
moment is such, that already two
scientific theories do exist. Each
one of them states something exactly
opposite. Thus the matter of the
creation of man by God ceases to
be just a matter of a "roller of
science bulldogging through statements
of religions", and becomes a matter
of two opposite scientific theories
which coldly analyze arguments and
evidence available. Of course, for
various reasons, for example because
of the so-called scientific inertia,
or because of reasons discussed on
a separate web page about
carriers of evil,
the official Earth's science still for
a long time will try to silence whatever the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
tries to realize to everyone. So in
order that people receive a chance
of making their own mind about findings
and evidence about the origin of man,
which are indicated by this Concept
of Dipolar Gravity, in part B of this
web page is explained what exactly
this concept states. So through
reading this web page readers have
a chance to make up their own opinion
on this subject. Because from the
scientific theory named the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
a new philosophy of life grew up, named
moral totalizm,
the findings and evidence presented
in part B of this web page express
also the official stand of the
philosophy of totalizm
in the matter of origins (creation)
of man.
Part #D:
The "simulated history of the universe and man" - means
a kind of fantastic story invented by God and then
implanted into the physical world that God created:
#D1.
What states the "simulated history of the universe and man" - means
this history which present human science laboriously pieces together
from the "evidence" that was implanted by the omnipotent
God
into the very fabric of the physical world that surrounds us:
Already for several centuries human scientists
research the physical world that surrounds
us. On the basis of material evidence that
they discovered in this material world, they
try to laboriously piece together the history
of the universe and man. But, as this web
page clarifies this, the history that they piece
together is the "simulated history of the universe
and man" - means a kind of a fable invented
by God in order to accomplish His superior
goals described in item #A2 of this web page
and then implanted into the physical world that
surrounds us. We all approximately know this
history from lessons in our schools and from
our textbooks. So it is NOT necessary to
repeat it here. Thus let us only remind here
the most key components of it.
The most vital point of this "simulated history of
the universe and man" is that according to it the
universe supposed to come to existence around
14 billions years ago in the result of a big bang.
In turn the only known so far evidence that this
"big bang" supposedly appeared, is so-called
"red shift" in light of stars. Of course, scientists
do NOT consider facts described in items #D2
and #D2.1 of the web page
dipolar_gravity.htm - about the Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
especially that this "red shift" of light of stars
in fact results from propagation of this light
"against current" of the gravity field of these
stars.
Another key point of this "simulated history of
the universe and man" is that according to it all
living creatures, including into this also humans,
originate from a natural (i.e. purely accidental
and random) so-called evolution. But
as this is revealed by the item #D3 below, there
is evidence available which contradicts the origins
of life and living organisms from such an evolution.
The name "evolution" most frequently is
assigned to a scientific theory developed
by Charles Darwin, which (the theory) in 1859
was published for the first time in relationship
to the animal and plant kingdom in the book
by Darwin entitled "On the Origin of Species
by Means of Natural Selection", while in 1871
was extended also on the origin of humans
in another book by Darwin entitled "The
Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation
to Sex". (Darwin lived from 12 February 1809
to 19 April 1882.) There are numerous definitions
of this sensitive word "evolution". After all, this
word can be defined from many different points
of view. Probably the most popular definition of
it is provided in the encyclopaedia - I quote
it here after "The New Encyclopaedia Britannica",
15th edition, 1996, ISBN 0-85229-605-3, Volume
4, page 623: "Evolution: theory in biology that
postulates that the various types of animals and
plants have their origin in other preexisting types
and that the distinguishable differences are
due to modifications in successive generations."
According to disciples of the theory of evolution,
the mechanism which propels it is the process
of natural selection (the survival of fittest). According
to them, it is this mechanism that caused that
with the elapse of time the man evolved on Earth.
But before the man appeared, on Earth supposed
to live a still unknown ancestor of the man, to
which usually scientists refer as to a "missing link".
This ancestor supposed to be common to both,
people and monkeys. Therefore the disciples of
evolution claim that the closest relative of the man
in the animal kingdom are monkeys. (Usually they
indicate chimpanzees.)
#D3.
Which evidence suggests that present
disciples of evolution in fact are tricked by
God:
Unfortunately, the blind insisting of the followers
of the theory of evolution, that only laws and forces
of nature provide the direction and the propelling
force for evolution, is NOT able to explain a whole
array of paradoxes and puzzles from the universe
which surrounds us. Let us list here some examples
of such paradoxes which confirm that living creatures
could NOT originate from a "natural (random) evolution".
(1) Theory of probability - i.e. according to it, the
origins of life through a purely random "evolution"
is completely impossible. The complete
improbability of the random occurence of the
first stage of "natural evolution" is the most
strong argument for "creation". Actually so-called
"evolutionists" are unable to abolish or contradict it.
This argument states roughly that we all have within
us protein molecules, which are necessary for our
life processes. So what are the odds that 1 protein
molecule would randomly form out in the very initial
stage of evolution from a primitive mineral "soup"
which long ago existed somewhere in oceans of
our planet? Evolutionists admit that it would be
about 1 in 10 to the 113th power (i.e. 1 followed
by 113 zeros). According to mathematicians,
any event that has just one chance in 10 to the 50th
power (1 followed by 50 zeros) is dismissed as never
happening. To get a sense of that number with 113
zeros, it would be greater than the estimated total
number of all the atoms in the universe. But we are
only talking about 1 protein molecule. Some proteins
are used as structural materials, and others as enzymes.
Around 2000 enzyme proteins are needed for a cell's
functions. What are the chances of all of these happening
at random? 1 chance in 10 to the 40,000th power
(i.e. 1 followed by 40,000 zeros). The famous astronomer
Fred Hoyle commented on this figure: "An outrageously
small probability, that could not be faced even if the whole
universe consisted of organic soup... If one is not
prejudiced either by social beliefs or by a scientific
training into the conviction that life originated [spontaneously]
on the Earth, this simple calculation wipes the idea
entirely out of court." ("Evolution From Space", p. 24.)
[above information taken from the book "Life - How Did
It Get Here? By Evolution or by Creation?"]
The above is simplified in the
Bible
through words:
"For every house is built by someone, but the
builder of all things is God." (Hebrews 3:4).
(2) Final products - independently from conditions
in which the evolution takes place, final products of
it seems to be the same. Thus, for example bacteria -
the evolution of which took place in Mars, and
which have fallen to Earth in Antarctic, have the design
and characteristics almost identical to bacteria from
Earth. But on Mars the prevailing conditions are
drastically different than these on Earth. Thus they
should lead to the evolution of creatures which are
different from these on the Earth.
(3) Intelligence of particles. Another example
of paradoxes discussed here is that the evolution
does NOT explain why intelligence is displayed not
only by the behaviour of people, but also e.g. by the
behaviour of elementary particles (i.e. components
of atoms). So is it possible that these particles also
are subjected to a natural selection which forced them
to evolve intelligence?
(4) So-called "missing links" - or rather the lack of
these. In addition to the above paradoxes,
as so far, in spite of intense searches, the present
science is unable to find even a slightest sign of
this "missing link" - this in turn seems to suggest
that such a link either does NOT exist on Earth,
or the disciples of the evolution seek it in completely
wrong places.
* * *
Therefore it is necessary to search for different
mechanisms and different propelling forces for
the development of the universe, than just such
a "blind" evolution. So far, the most significant
out of these different mechanisms is indicated by
the disciples of the creation, who unnecessary
consider themselves to be a competition to evolution.
Also an increasingly larger number of people is
attracted to the theory of an "Intelligent Design".
The disciples of this theory believe, expressing
this with a large simplification, that the man from
Earth was designed and farmed by intelligent
aliens through the use of genetic engineering.
(Note that this just shifts the problem onto distant
stars, because it still does NOT explain who
designed and farmed these intelligent aliens.)
This web page adds still another view to the
discussion about the origin of the man. The
view presented on this web page originates
from findings of a scientific theory called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity.
It links together claims of both, the evolutionists
and disciples of the creation. This is because it
states that God utilises the process of evolution
in the gradual improvement of the universe,
and that the present form of people is just one
amongst numerous stages in this infinitive evolution.
It also indicates where most probably hide remains
of this "missing link" from the human evolution.
#D4.
The origins of each amongst these two opposite histories
of the universe and man must stem from the actual
existence of two groups of convincing evidence and
proofs that supports the correctness of each one of
them - although only one of these histories can be true:
All groups of people never insist on claims
without some fact basis. Thus, there
must exist some items of evidence which
support the increasingly intense exchange
of arguments between disciples of two basic
views about origins of the universe and man.
It is known that the main part of views of
so-called "creationists" results from the
Bible authorised by God Himself.
But the Bible is NOT the only source of their
perseverance and determination. In turn the
fact basis for another view adhered by
so-called "evolutionists" results from findings of
modern science. The disciples of each one out
of these two basic views present their arguments
in a manner, as if only one of them is based on
evidence - and thus was correct, while the other
one is imagined - and thus is false. Unfortunately,
such stand in equivalent to accusation of the other
side to be blind and unrealistic. After all, it implicates
the lack of evidence at the other side. On the other
hand both sides have the evidence and proofs which
should NOT be allowed to be ignored, and which
should be considered and researched. Therefore
the relatively new scientific theory of everything named the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
commands to stop this mutual negation of the evidence
of the opposite side, and concentrate exclusively
on researching the merit of this evidence.
In other words, logical and philosophical analyses
carried out within the Concept of Dipolar Gravity
indicate that in fact both
camps which unnecessary argue with each other
have the fully valid evidence. After all, there are various
premises and evidence which suggest that the
man is really a product of a chain of gradual
improvements which are called "evolution" - as this
is correctly discovered and researched by Charles
Darwin. On the other hand there are also items
of evidence which confirm that the course and
goals of this "evolution" is continually controlled by
God.
In fact God did NOT create everything in a single
go, and everything in already a final version of it.
In reality God also utilises the gradual evolution,
means God improves the Universe slowly although
continually - similarly as people do this with their
long-term developments and products. Therefore,
in reality the followers of both mutually arguing
views are right. So instead of wasting energy
and resources for this academic arguing, the
disciples of both views should rather join their
forces in order to determine how exactly God
controlled the evolution to create the man, and
in which way in his infinitive process of creation
He used, and still uses, the process of intelligently
controlled evolution as his basic tool.
The merging of forces of both these camps would
allow to explain many puzzles. For example, it
could reveal that direct ancestor of humans
from the past of human family, in fact could
be the creature so well know to all of us and
usually named the "siren" (e.g. a creature
similar to the "Little Mermaid" - the well-known
statue of which adorns the harbour in
Copenhagen, Denmark, while a relative of
her adorns the city of Warszawa in Poland),
and also that remains of these our ancestors
in fact can be hidden on bottoms of seas and oceans,
not on lands - where they are unsuccessfully
searched by present scientists. The merging
of forces of both these camps could probably
also verify the extensive body of evidence that
the closest still alive relatives of humans are not
monkeys, but whales and dolphins - as this is
described in item #F2 below.
#D5.
The existence of the evidence and proofs which
confirm the creation of the physical world and man
by God automatically invalidates merit of evidence
on which the present official science based its
piecing together its version of history of the universe
and man:
The logical and philosophical researching
the merit of evidence presented by both
"evolutionists" and "creationists" gives out
extremely interesting results. For example,
if the truth lies on the side of "evolutionists",
i.e. when the universe and man really originated
from some natural phenomena and powers - e.g.
purely random evolution, then never in such
universe would have right to appear evidence
in support of claims of "creationists". Means,
if "evolutionists" are correct, than there should
NOT exist evidence in support of "creationists" -
a part of which describes this web page. But if
the truth lies on the side of "creationists", then
in the universe could exist both these items of
evidence which is used by "creationists", as
well as items of evidence used by "evolutionists".
After all, if the physical world and man were
created by omnipotent God, then God in order
to accomplish His superior goals could also
invent, create, and implant evidence that
supposedly support the existence of random
evolution. Because in fact there is a body of
evidence in support of simultaneously both
these sides, this conclusively certifies that
the true is only the version of "creationists".
In turn evidence on which is based the official
science in its piecing together a "natural" version
of history of the universe, are simply invented
by God and then created for accomplishing
some Godly goals. So we can jocosely state
that present human scientists are victims
of a joke of God who simply "have them on".
#D6.
The lesson which God serves to us through the fabrication of this untrue "simulated history of the universe":
God decisively is grooming people to be
"hardened in fire" and determined seekers
of truth. Therefore, in the light of what I have
presented in previous items, there is a burning
need to replace the stubbornness to-date
in matters of the origins of man, with logic
and with reasoning
based on evidence and facts. To accomplish
this, the discussion between religions and
science needs to be replaced by the discussion
between adherers of two scientific theories,
namely the Darwin's theory which stands
"contra" the creation of man by God, and the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
which stands "pro" creation of man by God.
Due to such a replacement, the topic of
creation of man by God is to be
shifted from the present area of
squabble between two similarly
close-minded sides, into the area of rational
discussion about the evidential value of
arguments, logic of deductions, true state
of things, creative experience of people, etc.
Therefore, a basic goal of this web page is
to cause just such shift in accentuation of
this vital discussion
Of course, the accomplishments of this web
page hopefully serve towards the turning of
present arguing into a future constructive
discussion. One of these accomplishments
is the indication as to how the matter of origins of
man is explained by the theory of everything named the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity.
Furthermore, another accomplishment of this
web page is to indicate the body of evidence
which the Concept of Dipolar Gravity
accumulated in support of its findings.
Still another accomplishment of this
web page is to reveal how the Concept
of Dipolar Gravity places the fact of the
creation of man by God within the entire
process of formation of our present reality,
means in relation to the process of self-evolution
of God and the later process of creation of
our physical world by God.
#D7.
Time to realise that the followers of evolution, and the disciples of the creation of the man by
God,
are divided mainly by stubbornness, emotions, and the lack of will to find a common ground:
The disciples of the evolution behave in their
arguments as if they were sworn enemies of
the disciples of the creation, and vice versa.
However, if one analyses thoroughly arguments
of both sides, then it turns out that there is more
stubbornness and intentional building of walls
around own views, than the actual logic and
accord with empirical data on the world around
us. For example, the disciples of the natural
evolution (E) on purpose do not want to take
notice of the following facts:
(E1)
The process of gradual improvement of objects already
existing, which is described by the word "evolution", in
fact is the only manner in which intelligent beings are
able to improve the level of perfection in their products.
Putting this in other words, if a superior being called
God wishes to improve the level of perfection of whatever
He created, then in fact He must utilize the process of
introducing gradual improvements, which our science calls
the "evolution". Evolution is also used by people in their
continuous effort of constructing the increasingly more
perfect technical devices, intellectual products, descriptions,
accomplishments, etc. For example, if people were
invisible like God, but some scientists who arrived to
Earth from the space could watch e.g. our cars or
computers (without seeing people), then he also would
formulate the theory of evolution for them, claiming that
cars and computers on Earth are developing on
principles of gradual evolution.
(E2)
Principles of logic and methods of action remain exactly
the same, no matter who uses them.
Expressing this in other words, if the only method of
action which allows to accomplish increasingly more
perfect products, depends on gradual improving them
step-by-step - as this is done by people in subsequent
generations of their houses, cars, or computers, then
this method must be used by every kind of intelligent
beings, including God.
* * *
In turn disciples of the creation (C) of man,
not only that overlook the above facts, but in
addition do not take under account that:
(C1)
Many expressions and descriptions in the Bible have
purely allegorical meaning. In fact the Bible is
full of descriptions which should be taken allegorically,
not literally. For example see the "Revelation" 19:15,
which describes the arrival of Second Jesus to Earth,
quote "Out of his mouth come a sharp sword, ...".
(How one can take literally the description that
someone would hold a sword in his mouth. So this
description must be interpreted allegorically as a
statement, that words and ideas disseminated by
Second Jesus will cut enemies similarly as this is
done by a sword.) So it is just a blind stubbornness
to claim that the biblical description of the creation
of world and man must be taken literally.
(C2)
These who wrote the Bible used an archaic language,
which still lacked many ideas and terms present in
today languages. So how, for example, in times
of writing the Bible could be explained, that there
were seven evolutionary periods in the process
of creation of the world and man - if these who
wrote the Bible did NOT know yet the terminology
"evolutionary period" or "era". Of course, in such
case they used the word "day", which (the word)
in meaning lied the closest to these two terms that
they did not know. So it would be an absurd to insist
now on the literal taking the description that God
created the world and the man during 6 days (while
on 7th day He rested). Especially that somewhere
in the Bible itself is written, that in each place
where in the Bible the word "day" is used, one should
understand it as 1000 years. (I encountered this
statement in Bible sometimes ago, but presently
when I tried to find it again and refer it here,
I was unable to find it fast. But indirectly the
same is expressed by following words from "2 Peter 3:8" -
quote "But do not ignore this one fact, beloved,
that with the Lord one day is as a thousand years,
and a thousand years as one day." Exactly the
same is expressed in psalm 90 "A Prayer of Moses,
the man of God" - quote from verse 4 "For a
thousand years in thy sight are but as yesterday
when it is past, or as a watch in the night.")
In order to be even more interesting, in Biblical
times the number 1000 was not meaning the same
as today number 1000. This is because then it
was the largest number that existed in the
Roman numbering system. (Romans marked it
with the letter "M", and they did not know any
larger number.) Thus the biblical expression
"thousand years" in fact can mean the same as
"so many years as it only is possible to express
with the largest number that we know". After all
present people also say "millions" while they think
"as many as only our numbers are able to express it".
One needs to remember as well, that for God -
who exists for eternity, the elapse of time
has a completely different meaning as for
people. More comprehensively this is explained
on separate web pages
god.htm - about scientific replies of the secular philosophy of totalizm to basic questions about God,
and web page
timevehicle.htm - about mechanism of time, shifting time back, and about time vehicles.
Thus, in the God's system of the elapse of time,
whatever for human historians will represent an
entire era, for God can be an equivalent of a
single day.
For more data about the creation of the physical
world by God see "part I" from the web page about
the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
or see subsection P6.1 from volume 13 of monograph
[1/4].
* * *
If one considers the above facts in his deductions,
then rapidly it turns out that both, the followers
of the evolution, and disciples of the creation, in
fact describe the same general mechanism of
the origin of man, only that they pay a whole
attention to just a single small detail from a whole
range of details and aspects of this mechanism.
So in fact there is no difference in claims and views
of either of these groups, but only there is a human
stubbornness and the someone's evil attempt to "divide
and rule" amongst others through the use of such
different views on the origin of mankind. Furthermore,
everything seems to indicate that the true message
which the disciples of the evolution are trying to secretly
disseminate via their views, is the message that "God
does NOT exist". In turn the only message which
the disciples of the creation of the man try to disseminate
with their arguments, is the claim that descriptions from
the Bible are NOT allowed to be treated allegorically
nor interpreted from the point of view of the advancement
of knowledge and the making of human language increasingly
precise, but should be taken literally up to every single
letter. However, it is worth to notice, that the philosophy
of
totalizm
in fact abolishes the validity of both these claims.
(I.e. it formally proves the existence of God, and
also it redefines more precisely with modern strict
language many ideas which in the Bible are
presented loosely with an ancient language.)
Part #E:
The body of evidence which confirms that really
two histories of the universe and man do exist,
namely (1) the true one (described in the Bible),
and (2) invented and simulated by God (the one
disseminated by scientists):
#E1.
Which evidence confirms that in fact two
histories of the universe do exist:
If we carefully look around, then it is easy
to notice that in reality there is a lot of scientifically
verifiable evidence which confirms the fact
described here, that the universe and man
have two different histories of their origins
(although only one out of these two is true).
Here are examples of this evidence:
(1) The lack of conclusive evidence which would
undeniably prove that the "simulated history of the
universe and man" (i.e. the history pieced together
and adhered by present atheistic science) is the
true history. For example, there is a lack of this
"missing link" for humans, as well as the lack of similar
"missing links" for all other animals which we see
around us, e.g. for a horse, cow, goat, pig, etc.
In addition, for example the so-called "red shift" in
light of stars - which supposedly is the "major proof"
for the existence of the "big bang", also turns out
to be highly ambiguous and have a more correct
explanation that confirms the creation of the physical
world by God. (I provided this explanation in items
#D2 and #D2.1 of the web page
dipolar_gravity.htm - about the Concept of Dipolar Gravity.)
If the evolution and scientifically promoted history
of the universe were true, then evidence which
confirm them would be easily accessible. But such
evidence is missing. On the other hand, if God
invented and passed off upon human scientists
this additionally simulated history of the universe
and man, then God would never create and allow
to find a conclusive proof which would confirm
this make up history. After all, in case God creates
such a conclusive proof that confirms an untrue
history, than with this creation He would simultaneously
contradict the truth of His own words which He
included into the Bible authorised by himself.
Furthermore, He would make impossible to future
generations of people to find the truth on this subject.
(2) The "evidence" which scientists "discover" and
use for the formulation of this "simulated history of
the universe and man" did NOT exist from the very
beginning. Means, there is the lack of confirmation
that e.g. skeletons of dinosaurs existed and were
found lets say 2000 years ago (in times of Jesus).
In other words, the items of evidence which scientists
research today, was created by God only on the
relatively recent stage of the human history, when
God realised that in addition to the true history of
the universe and man there is also the need to
create this additional, untrue, "simulated history of
the universe".
(3) God really indicates in His actions the lack of
experience and imperfections of His methods of
action which well illustrate the activities of a slightly
over 6-thousands years old "God-youngster".
If one analyses more carefully the methods of action
which God uses at present, then it turns out that
some amongst these methods could already be much
more perfect. As an example let us consider the
treatment which God serves to human discoverers
and inventors. This treatment is so contradictive to
the "universal justice" which God represents, that
on many web pages of totalizm I call them the
"curse of inventors" - for examples of it see item
#G6 on the web page
eco_cars.htm - about progress in the development of pollution-free cars,
item #H1 on the web page
newzealand_visit.htm - whether God supports the populating of Antipodes by people,
and also item #K3 on the web page
fe_cell.htm - about the telekinetic cell, means about the source of unlimited amounts of free energy.
On the other hand accomplishing scientific discoveries
and new inventions is the activity with the highest level
of morality. After all, God created man so that humans
could further the knowledge, means so that they make
discoveries and inventions. Simultaneously the iron
rule of God is that in the name of the "universal justice"
He rewards all morally correct actions. Thus inventors
and discoverers also should be rewarded by God.
However, God treats them with this "curse of inventors".
It means God punishes them for carrying out morally
correct activities. This in turn means that His methods
of action towards people are NOT as yet perfected to
the end. Similarly imperfect methods of action of God
can be found more after thorough analyses (e.g.
consider reasons behind the saying "good dies young").
Only that the goal of this web page is NOT to point
them out.
The well known to totalizm reason for which God
treats every discoverer and inventor with this "curse
of inventors", is the "moral law" which states that
everything must be earned. Unfortunately,
there is a huge disproportion between whatever
inventors and discoverers would have to endure
if they just "earned" for themselves the benefits
that they ripe from their accomplishments, and
what they really is brutally served to them taking
the form of clear repressions and punishments.
Besides, practically none inventor or discoverer
accomplishes any tangible benefits out of his or
her contribution to the humanity. Simultaneously
is so severely treated as if he or she benefited
from his or her accomplishments the entire life
through. Therefore, according to the principle of
the universal justice it would be more righteous if
the inventors and discoverers were make to "earn"
just whatever benefits that themselves gain from
from their accomplishments. In turn other people
also would be make to "earn" for themselves for
their own share of benefits drawn from a given
invention or discovery. In capabilities of God lies
such a reforming the reality. An example how it
can be accomplished, is the requirement of earning the
nirvana -
if someone wants to gain an access to
immortality.
In this way the present highly unjust situation would
be repaired, when e.g. an inventor dies from hunger
and exclusion only because he was make to "earn"
everything that his invention brought to the entire
humanity. Simultaneously other people later glen
benefits from his invention without any effort - although
they never earned these benefits.
Fortunately, I managed to learn methods and
principles with the aid of which inventors can
self-defend themselves from effects of the
"curse of inventors" (and also from effects
of "inventive impotency" which stems from
this curse) - although, unfortunately, for me
currently it is too late to apply these in case
of my own inventions. But just in case I already
described these methods and principles on
my web pages - for the benefit and information
of other inventors. Explanations how to implement
such defences, the reader can find e.g. in item
#H1 to #H3 of the totaliztic web page named
eco_cars.htm.
(4) The existence of many important reasons which
motivated God to invent and implant to His creation
the "simulated history of the universe and man"
in spite that there is also a "true history of the
universe". People are motivated to actions
by a whole range of different factors, e.g. because
they want either power, or money, or pleasure,
or love, or revenge, etc. But if we analyse actions
of God, then it turns out that His motivations are
different. Most frequently God undertakes an action
because appeared reasons for which He should act.
Frequently God also acts in a specific manner in
order to teach and inspire people. A vital motivation
for actions of God is also maintaining the universal
justice. (Of courser there are also further motivations.)
Thus analysing actions of God we can state that if
reasons appeared, for sure after some time always
action of God follows these reasons. So since there
are these extremely vital reasons for inventing,
creating, and implanting the untrue, "simulated
history of the universe and man" (described in
item #A2 at the beginning of this web page), this
means that God really took actions to satisfy these
reasons.
#E2.
Why every item of supposed "evidence" for a purely
random evolution, in reality with the same power
proves also the fact of the creation of man by
God:
Motto:
"Every item of supposed 'evidence' which by the
adherers of a purely random evolution is indicated
as a proof of a 'natural' evolution of man, in
reality with at least the same power proves also
the fact of the creation of man by God. There is
even no single item of evidence which would support
exclusively the process of a random evolution of
man, and would contradict the intentional creation
of man by God. On the other hand there is a wealth
of evidence which supports the fact of the purposeful
creation of man by God, but which simultaneously
contradicts the possibility that man is a product
of a purely random evolution."
The dark force of
makers of evil
mentioned already earlier on this web
page, unleashed on Earth a hysterical
campaign in the style let us all
attack religions, that ruthlessly
attacks and destroys adherers of the
creation of man by God. But it turns
out that this noisy campaign is in fact
a "colosus which stands on legs of clay".
As it turns out, practically every out
of supposed "evidence" indicated by
adherers of the purely random evolution
of man, that it supposedly certifies
for the "natural" (means purely coincidental)
evolution of man, in fact with at least
the same power proves also the fact that
man was created by God. Only that this
double-sided attribute of evidence for
the origins of man, so-far was NOT revealed
nor explained to the society. There is
several reasons for the silence about
this double-sided sward of supposed
evidence of evolutionists. The most
vital of these is that before the
formulation of the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity
adherers of the creation off man by
God had no tool which would indicate
in what manner these supposed evidence
for the random evolution in fact also
support the purposeful creation of
the man. Another reason is this loud-mouth
hysteria of the adherers of random
evolution, and also the ruthless methods
that they use to destroy their opponents.
It causes that there is no many scientists
who would have a courage publicly reveal
the shabbiness of the supposed 'evidence'
of the adherers of a random evolution.
However, in reality there is NO even a
single item of supposed 'evidence' which
by the adherers of a purely random evolution
is indicated as a proof of a 'natural'
evolution of man, and that in reality
would NOT support also the fact of the
creation of man by God with at least
the same power. There is also even no
single item of evidence which would
support exclusively the process of a
random evolution of man, and would
contradict the intentional creation
of man by God. On the other hand, there
is a wealth of evidence which supports
the fact of the purposeful creation
of man by God, but which simultaneously
contradicts the possibility that man
is a product of a purely random evolution.
This evidence which in the unique manner
supports exclusively the truth about
the purposeful creation of man by God,
is indicated and discussed in item
#C1 of this web page. In turn this item
summarizes the manner in which supposed
'evidence' of the adherers of coincidental
evolution is in fact also an evidence for
the purposeful creation of man by God.
Here is a list of most vital 'evidence'
indicated by the adherers of supposedly
random evolution of man, together with
explanations how this "evidence" in fact
with at least the same power support also
the fact of purposeful creation of man
by God:
(1)
Principle of the survival of fittest.
Adherers of the random evolution indicate
this principle as their "crown evidence"
that supposed to explain the mechanism
behind the manner in which new species
of creatures are developed. However, if
one analyses the self-evolution of God
described in item #B1, then it turns out,
that also in case of a purposeful creation
of animals by God the same principle
fulfils a whole range of functions.
For example it: (a) memorizes the fact
of the fight for survival which God also
needed to endure during his own evolution,
(b) continually reminds the possibility
of a similar fight for survival to take
place in the future, (c) for all it is
a factor that motivates the growth,
development, increase of knowledge,
and putting an effort, (d) it provides
a foundation for the formation of so-called
moral laws,
(e) it promotes health amongst animals
(see item #F2 below), etc., etc.
(2)
Ontogenesis repeats the filogenesis' way.
(I.e. that the "development of an individual
repeats the development of the entire specie".)
This principle is described in items #C2 (5)
and #B5 (6) of this web page about
intelligently controlled evolution of man.
In fact it is one amongst mechanisms in '
the general principle which God applied
during the creation of the physical world,
namely that every event and every process
must leave some permanent traces that it
occurred. The principle that "ontogenesis
repeats the filogenesis' way" is just a
manner of recording trails of the history
of the development of a given specie.
#E3.
Since God promotes two histories of the universe and man, i.e. (1) the true one (religious), and
(2) simulated (scientific), then what stand we people should take in the matter of these two histories:
Well, our choice is simple. Since the omnipotent
God promotes two different histories of the
universe, this means that God wants us to
learn both of them equally thoroughly and
treat them both equally. It seems that God
wants us to train our learning capabilities
and skills of finding the truth on both of them.
Therefore our (people) task is to treat both
of them equally seriously and both of
them research in details and with fervour,
so that both of them gain equal attention and
consideration. Also none of them can be
discriminated only because e.g. it does NOT
agree with our view of the world. Only in our
statements and in our thinking we should
clearly distinguish between them both, e.g.
through adding to each one of them some
qualifiers in order to emphasize about which
history of the universe or man we just talk
or write.
Part #F:
Dolphins and whales - means the closest relatives of people:
#F1.
If people are products of the "evolution directed by God", then which still alive creatures on Earth are most probably the closest relatives of man:
If one accepts the fact, that God in fact utilised
a process of controlled evolution in order to
develop present humans, then somewhere in
the universe creatures did exist at some stage,
from which humans were created (evolved).
Although until today probably these creatures
got extinct, still their close relatives must exist
somewhere. So which creatures still alive on
the Earth are in fact closest relatives of humans?
Means are these monkeys (e.g. chimpanzees) - as
this is indicated by disciples of the "natural evolution"?
I personally believe, that increasingly significant
evidence indicates that the man evolved from a
water creature, or more specifically from a kind
of a "siren" or a "nymph". In my opinion,
everything indicates that these extraordinary
water creatures, which in legends are described
under the name of "sirens" or "nymphs",
are the "missing link" which is searched
for so stubbornly on lands by the official human
science. Only that these creatures got extinct
already several thousands years ago, while
anthropologists do not carry out diggings on
bottoms of seas to be able to detect their remains
over there. Fortunately, close relatives of
this creature survived on Earth until today.
These are sea animals belonging to a
general group of "cetaceans", to which
belong "whales", "dolphins", and
"porpoises". Thus, in my personal
opinion, from the point of view of
true genealogy, whales, dolphins
and porpoises are much more close
relatives of people than e.g. monkeys.
(Perhaps this explains why in recent times there
must be such a vicious battle over the saving of
whales from a complete hunting down by
Japan, Norway, and Island. Probably these
nations which fight for the right to kill
whales do not wish to have alive on Earth
any animal relatives.)
#F2.
Evidence which indicates that people evolved from "water creatures", e.g. similar to
mythological sirens, and that the closest still alive relatives of humans are whales and dolphins:
In item #H2 of this web page explained is
the fact shocking for some people, that
the "holistic" comparison of genetic codes
is completely useless for establishing the
genealogy of given species. This is because with the
entire genetic codes is similar to entire technical
diagrams of cars in different factories, from
which (the entire diagrams) also it is impossible
to determine the genealogy and mutual
relationship of separate types of cars.
(Although, if someone knows exactly what and
where to look in such technical diagrams, then
the relationship of subsequent types of cars he
or she can determine from brief comments
which designers of cars write in small sections
of these diagrams, e.g. on their corners or frames -
for details see item #H4 of this web page.)
For example, whole technical diagrams of a
bus produced by Mercedes will suggest,
that this bus is a relative to the bus produced
e.g. by Hyundai or Daewoo, but will NOT
show that it is a relative the limousine from
the Mercedes factory. (However, in reality
with Mercedes and Hyundai or Daewoo
is exactly opposite. But in order to discover
this, someone who does not know these buses
would need to learn how to read small writings
well hidden in corners of technical drawings of
these buses.) The "holistic" analysis of genetic
codes illustrates only details of the design,
operation, and conditions in which given species
are living, coded in a special "genetic language"
which human science still has not decoded.
So these scientists who claim that e.g. whole
genetic codes of e.g. monkeys
are proofs for the proximity of blood between
monkeys and people, simply do not know
what they are talking about. In turn if one accepts
this inconvenient truth about the entire genetic
codes, then at our present level of knowledge,
completely different facts must be used for
the indicators of alliance of separate species
of creatures. Below I am listing a whole series
of such indicators. In my opinion they prove,
that from the point of view of true genealogy,
the closest still alive animal
relatives of people are whales and dolphins.
Simultaneously monkeys have the same in
common with people, as frogs' tadpoles have
in common with fish. Here are these indicators:
(1)
The lack of hairs in almost the entire body, but the
presence of hairs on the head. All mammals,
the last stages of evolution of which took place on
lands, are covered with fur. In turn all creatures, the
last stages of the evolution of which took place in
waters, have a naked skin. The man has skin
deprived of the hairs on almost the entire body,
like his water relatives which still live until today,
e.g. like whales and dolphins. Almost the only
area where the man maintained the hairs, is the
top of his head - most clearly his evolutionary
ancestors used to swim with heads sticking out from
water.
(2)
The standing pose, which is also attempted by e.g.
sea lions after they enter a hard ground. Land
animals rarely develop a standing position in the
process of evolution. In turn when they are forced
by something to take this position, then usually
this causes in them the degeneration of their upper
limbs, with a simultaneous doubling of power and
size of the lower limbs (as an example consider
kangaroo or two-legged dinosaurs). But water
mammals, instinctively tend to assume on land
the standing position which reflects their position
in water during breathing. Thus after they emerge
on lands they still show the tendency to maintain
this position - as an example consider the position
instinctively assumed by sea lions after they stand
on a seashore.
(3)
Human feet similar to flippers, e.g. in frogs, means
feet completely different from the "hands" on legs of
monkeys. Human feet have the shape more
resembling the flippers of water creatures, e.g. frogs
or seals, than paws of land animals. All signs indicate
that human feet are evolutionarily transformed flippers
similar to these from backs of seals.
(4)
The similarity of skeletons in frontal flippers of some
whales and dolphins, to skeletons of human hand-palms.
Some whales and dolphins have bones in their front
flippers, which are almost identical to bones from human
(hand) palms. In fact bones in their frontal flippers are
much more similar to bones in human hand-palms,
than are bones in hand-palms of monkeys. Actually
does not exist on Earth any other creature, the bone
structure of frontal limbs of which would be more similar
to bones in hand-palms of humans than this takes place
in flippers of some whales and dolphins.
(5)
The instinctive skill of swimming in human babies.
According to the evolutionary principle developed in
XIX century by the German evolutionist, Ernst Haeckel,
which states that the "ontogenesis repeats the filogenesis'
way", (i.e. that the "development of an individual repeats
the development of the entire specie"), if people evolved
from a water creature than human babies should be able
to swim instinctively. And in fact everyone knows perfectly
well, that human babies in the age when they still are
unable to walk, actually have an instinctive ability to
swim. (What even more interesting, this ability to swim
disappears in them immediately after they learn how
to walk.) In this first period of life, human babies swim
and regulate their breathing instinctively like small
dolphins. Thus practically this instinctive ability to
swim displayed by babies who still do not know how to
walk, is another evidence in support of the fact, that
ancestors of the man evolved from a water creature
(e.g. similar to sirens). (I am not going to deliberate
here on the well-known fact, that through a significant
section of the foetus development the human children
look like small dolphins.)
(6)
A similar taste of flesh in whales and humans.
A folklore of these nations,
which practiced cannibalism and also simultaneously
ate whale flesh (for example, as this was the case with
New Zealand Maoris), claimed that the taste of human
and whale flesh are very similar to each other, although
simultaneously very different from the taste of other
creatures, especially these living on land. In turn the
folklore of these nations, which used to eat both, people
and monkeys, e.g. like head hunters from Borneo, state
that the taste of monkey flesh is very different from the
taste of human flesh.
(7)
The preference of human body for the diet made of fish
and other sea or freshwater organisms. When the
evolution of any living organisms develops them to take
a specific kind of food, then this food turns out to be the
most suitable for them from every point of view. In turn
a shift towards eating any other kind of food always induces
various health problems in them. As it turns out, for people
the most suitable food seem to be fish and other creatures
and vegetation of seas and freshwater. In fact, present
scientists keep discovering increasingly larger number
of reasons for which fish, shellfish, crabs, seaweeds, and
other products of seas and freshwater, as well as individual
biological components contained in fish, shellfish,
crabs, seaweeds, and in other gifts of seas or waters,
turn out to be especially beneficial for human body.
Simultaneously they keep discovering increasingly
more reasons, for which diets other than these originating
from seas or from freshwaters induce various problems
in human bodies.
(8)
Instinctive preference of the taste of salted food.
Man is practically the only creature living on
land, which instinctively prefers eating salted
food over unsalted food. All other creatures,
although can voluntarily leak pure salt when their
bodies have a deficit of it, however they do not like
the taste of salted food nor eat such food. This is
best known to producers of e.g. cat food, and also
to owners of e.g. cats. After all, in normal cases cats
do not touch salted food. In turn e.g. salted grass or
fodder for cows, makes them intensely bloated and
may finish with their death. The only explanation for
this instinctive preference of people for the taste of
salted food, is that creatures from which humans
evolved, developed such taste because they ate
food mixed with salty sea water. Thus, their food
was always salty. This explanation is even confirmed
by quantitative facts. For example, the amount of
salt which people most prefer in their food, in typical
cases is equal to the amount of salt contained in
sea water.
(9)
The maintaining by people until present times the characteristic
"smell of fish" in intimate places. In turn this characteristic
"smell of fish" is unique to all sea creatures.
(10)
The existence in people of some remnant genetic codes
of sirens, which lead to cases of so-called "mermaid
syndrome". On Thursday, 13 March 2008, in
channel 2 of the New Zealand television, at 9:30 to
10:30 pm, a program named "20/20" was broadcasted.
In this program, amongst others, was a report about
a girl which was born with the so-called "mermaid
syndrome" which is extremely rare on the Earth.
This syndrome depends on a given person (usually
a girl) being born in the form when instead of human
legs and human internal organs, it develops a siren
tail, and internal organs which are more similar to
these from a siren than from a human. In this program
was shown, amongst
others, a scan of the foetus of this girl. This scan
show, that as a foetus for a long time she was
more similar to a foetus of a dolphin than to a foetus
of a human - e.g. she had flippers of a dolphin. Of
course, present medicine treats these rare cases
of the "mermaid syndrome" as coincidents. But we
cannot exclude the possibility that these are simply
genetic echoes which reveal to us the appearance
of creatures (i.e. sirens) from which God evolved
later the human genetic system. Such a possibility
of the "genetic echo of sirens" is confirmed by the
fact that this syndrome appears repetitively in non-related
people and that victims of it always have anatomic
details similar to each other.
(11)
The lovemaking while turned with bellies towards each other.
None out of the present land mammals (apart from the man)
is making love while being directed with their bellies
towards each other. However, just such a manner of
lovemaking is a standard in water mammals, e.g. in
whales.
(12)
Abstract thinking, the use of language, and the sense of
morality, appearing both, in the intellectual development
of people, as well as in whales and dolphins. In
fact the language, the process of thinking, and even
the sense of morality, are most developed and most
close to humans in water mammals, i.e. in dolphins
and in whales. It appears that the water environment
instigates the development of intelligence and speech.
For example, the comparison of richness of expressions
of the language used by dolphins, to voice signals used
by monkeys, is the same as the comparison of a language
of some primitive humans, e.g. from jungles of New Guinea
or Amazon, to voice signals of dogs. Whales and dolphins
have also human-like self-awareness, are able to recognise
themselves in mirrors, organise themselves in complex
societies, etc. For example, sperm whales demonstrate
even the sense of morality, when they e.g. do NOT use
their powerful fish-finding sonars at full blasts when other
whales are nearby, nor they use these sonars as weapons -
as these sonars would permanently deafen other whales
with full power blasts. Because of the all above attributes
of whales and dolphins, participants of two-day conference
at a University of Helsinki, who belong to the organisation
called the "Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society
(WDCS)", said in a declaration of 24 May 2010,
that, quote: "We affirm that all cetaceans as persons have
the right to life, liberty and wellbeing". The topic of that
declaration of "human rights" to whales and dolphins is
discussed, amongst others, in the article "Call to give
whales 'human rights' " from page B2 of New Zealand newspaper
The Dominion Post,
issue dated on Tuesday, May 25, 2010. Summarising the
above, even sceptical scientists admit, that there are NO
other animals on the Earth which would be so close to humans
in every possible aspects, as are whales and dolphins.
(13)
The existence in dolphins and whales human-related social behaviours.
In turn such related behaviours confirm that people
and dolphins and whales originate from the same
evolutionary chain. It is because only these two groups
evolved identical social behaviours, which are NOT
demonstrated by any other creatures. I provide here
the most drastic examples of such behaviours.
(13.1)
Departing to other world together with the respected
leader. The evolution provided people with an unique
impulse. Namely, if someone loved or respected dies,
then the ones who are emotionally linked with the deceased
commit suicides to go together to the other world. Spectacular
examples of this impulse include, amongst others, self-burning
of wives in old India together with corpses of their husbands,
burying in ancient Egypt important people together with
their entire court, fate of Romeo and Juliet, or present
"suicidal pacts" of some teenagers. Well, whales and
dolphins do the same. If e.g. the leader of a pack of
whales is sick and dying, then an entire pack commits
a suicide by "beaching" themselves.
(13.2)
Organising meetings for socializing, which are not justified by needs
of survival. Whales and dolphins organise repetitive
socializing gatherings in selected areas of the ocean.
These gatherings are not motivated by needs of survival,
e.g. are not for reproduction nor for gathering food.
So these are mainly for entertainment and for socializing -
as this takes place during human festivals and gatherings.
A place where e.g. whales meet, is a vicinity of the town
Kaikoura in New Zealand. Only people and whales and
dolphins developed evolutionary these kinds of meetings
which are not justified by the requirements of the survival.
(13.3)
Recognition for intelligence. Out of all creatures on
our planet, only people, whales, and dolphins are able
to recognise and respect intelligence in other creatures.
It is because of this recognising that e.g. dolphins treat
people as equal to themselves, sometime save ones who
could drown, and even sporadically volunteer to join human
groups - as this was the case with the dolphin called
"Opo"
from the New Zealand settlement of Hokianga, which since
the summer 1955 until 8 March 1956 behaved like a human
until was mischievously murdered with a blast of "gelignite"
most probably by
changelings
who would not allow it to illustrate the truth about
evolutionary relationship of people and dolphins.
(About a similar case of a dolphin, which at Hippo
in ancient Rome also behaved like a human, wrote
the historian Pliny the Younger around 100 A.D.)
(13.4)
The demonstration of awareness of being related to people.
Dolphins and whales are only animals, which demonstrate
that are aware of close relationship to people. They
demonstrate this awareness quite frequently, e.g. through
helping people or defending people. A description of
an extremely unusual case of such demonstration I have
found in the article "Tale of rescue by dolphins inspires film",
published in the New Zealand newspaper
"The New Zealand Herald",
issue dated on Wednesday, October 18, 2006, page A17.
In the article was described how on November 2004 four
members of the New Zealand lifesaving organisation
named "Whangarei Heads Surf Lifesaving" swam
around 100 meters into sea, where it become hunted
by around 3 meters long shark. Seeing that their lives
are in danger nearby group of dolphins surrounded these
4 people in a circle and for around 40 minutes risked
their own lives by scaring the shark, until rescue arrived.
The article lists names of these people rescued by dolphins:
Rob Howes, Nicky Howes, Karina Cooper, Helen Slade.
It also provides the name of the lifesaver who witnessed
from a close range this huge man-eating shark: Matt Fleet.
According to this article, now a film about the entire event
is prepared (the event was originally published in the New
Zealand "Northern Advocate"). Let us hope that this film
is to contribute to a better protection of still living dolphins,
the number of which is rapidly decreasing lately.
(14)
The existence of traits in whales and dolphins, which
apart from these animals appear only in people, e.g.
recognising themselves in mirrors, use of tools, showing
complex feelings, or having own culture. A British
man named Mark Simmonds, who is the director of
"the Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society", in
October 2006 published a very interesting scientific
article which discusses results of newest research
on whales and dolphins. Although I had no access
to the article itself, a summary of it carrying the title
"Whales and dolphins show distinctive human traits"
appeared on page A11 from the New Zealand newspaper
"The New Zealand Herald",
issue dated on Friday, October 6, 2006. In this
article Mr Simmonds points the attention of the
reader to a huge similarity between behaviour of
whales and dolphins, and the behaviour of humans.
Many areas of this similarity do not appear even
in monkeys. In order to mention here some of these,
whales and dolphins use tools like people do. With
easiness they recognise themselves in mirrors.
Furthermore, they show a whole range of complex
feelings known only in people - starting from joy
or grief, up to attentive care of the hurt. They display
also social behaviours, such as cooperative behaviours,
exchange of information, social learning and teaching,
or the use of common form of language. Furthermore,
they also have their own culture, which manifests itself,
amongst others, through complex songs, cultural life,
mutual assistance and accompanying in troubles,
etc., The article points the notice of readers onto
an overlooked previously danger of current push
for initiation of hunting whales and dolphins. Namely,
if accidentally leading individuals amongst
these animals are killed, then destroyed is
also their culture and knowledge which keep
them all alive. This in turn may cause their
complete extinction.
(15)
The use of some form of "language" which allows dolphins
a fast and unambiguous communication with whales.
On Wednesday, 12 March 2008, in television news of
New Zealand and Australia was presented an extraordinary
sighting of the New Zealand scientist. The scientist with
his own eyes saw how fast a dolphin called "Moko"
communicated with two strangled whales that wandered
between sandy dunes during the sea tiding-out.
Then the scientist saw also that dolphin saving lives
of the whales by leading them to a deep sea.
The next day these saving actions of the dolphin
were described in the article "How Moko the friendly
dolphin saved whales", from page A3 of the New
Zealand newspaper
"The Dominion Post",
issue dated on Thursday, March 13, 2008. Here is
a quotation of most vital sentences from that article:
"The whales were on the surface but when Moko
arrived all three submerged and swam out to sea.
'It was quite decisive, the change in their attitude.' ...
She communicated in some way with the two whales,
escorted them along the beach and a right-angle turn into
the channel, and we haven't seen the whales since."
Of course, the article is long and describes thoroughly
how people tried to save these two whales in a fast
tiding-out water, how the whales did show the disorientation
and distress resulting from the fact that they did not know
how to come out to a deep sea from a labyrinth of
shallow waters that surrounded them, and how after the
arrival of the dolphin the whales immediately learned from
her that there is an exit from this sandy trap, stopped
show the distress and vigorously followed the dolphin
which show to them where hides the channel that
leads to the deep sea. This sighting proves that
dolphins and whales intelligently communicate with
each other with even more ease that it is done by
people of different races and languages. It also indicates
that the reason for the so-called "beaching of whales" is just
the direction in which run echoes of the deep sea sounds
that bounce off the beach bank. (I.e. if we could eliminate
these echoes, whales would stop beaching themselves.)
(16)
The existence of many other examples when two separate
evolutionary chains leads to similar final products.
This in turn means, that in spite of apparent similarities
to monkeys, people could also evolve from the same
ancestor from which evolved dolphins and whales.
After all, in order to develop a similar final form,
various creatures do not need to be relatives. As
examples of similar, although completely unrelated
creatures, consider bats and birds, and also frog
tadpoles and fish, or eels and sea snakes.
In reality the fact, that there is an apparent similarity
of the shape between monkeys and people, does
not mean that from the point of view of genealogy,
monkeys and people are truly related, nor that they
are linked together by anything more than are e.g.
eels and sea snakes.
(17)
In the foetal development of dolphins limbs appear
similar to these in humans. As it turns out, in
the foetal development of dolphins a stadium does
exist, in which dolphins' foetuses develop humanly
looking limbs. Only that in next stages of their
foetal development these limbs convert into
flippers.
(18)
The existence of a mutation amongst dolphins, which formed
almost human hand palms. On Monday, 6 November
2006, I was shocked to hear in television news of New
Zealand - from two different channels, that near Japan
divers filmed dolphins with almost human palms.
A section of the film on these dolphins was shown that
day around 17:43 in news from TVNZ "Prime", while
around 18:23 at TVNZ channel 1. (But there was almost
nothing visible on it.) For several next days I sought in
newspapers anything on the subject of these extraordinary
dolphins, but I found nothing. However, I found sparse
information in Internet - under the keywords
dolphins with fins like human palms.
Although our knowledge about these unusual dolphins
is still too sparse in order to claim something for sure,
it appears that the genetic code of dolphins contains
a fault which allows the mutation of almost human hands.
Perhaps it were just such dolphins that at some stage
gave a beginning to creatures which in folklore are
called "sirens". Then a similar genetic code error caused
that in turn humans evolved from sirens. So all signs seem
to indicate, that dolphins not only are our living animal
relatives, but they also occasionally mutate almost
human organs.
* * *
A just brief skimming through the above evidence
already realises, that in spite of uselessness
of the present knowledge of genetic codes for
proving the genealogy
and relationship of separate species of creatures,
still numerous other categories of evidence are
available, which document that the man evolved
from a water creature, similar to mythological
sirens, and that the closest still alive relatives
of the man are NOT monkeys, but are whales
and dolphins. Even a laymen who is unfamiliar
with laws of nature and with theory of probability,
should be alerted by such large number of
common attributes, which are uniquely repeated
only in people and only in water relatives of
people - means in whales and in dolphins.
After all, according to the calculations of probability
provided in subsection P1 from volume 13 of
monograph
[1/4] -
on the occasion of a formal scientific proof for
the existence of UFOs presented there, the
existence of at least 12 such unique attributes
in common, excludes the possibility that the
similarities result just from a coincident, and
conclusively confirms that these similarities
represent the evidence that the given
species are mutually related.
Thus, the existence of the above number of
attributes in common for people and for water
relatives of people, is an equivalent of a formal
scientific proof that humanity in fact do originate
from a water creature related to present whales
and dolphins.
* * *
Fig. #F1: The skeleton of a baleen-whale exhibited for
a public viewing in the museum from Dunedin, New Zealand.
The evidence and logical deductions presented on this
web page document, that out of all creatures which populate
the Earth, just whales and dolphins, NOT monkeys, after
thorough research will prove one day to be the closest
relatives of the man. (Probably it is for this reason that
in recent years such countries as Japan, Norway, and
Island, do not spare resources nor efforts to be officially
allowed to hunt down and to eat these still alive relatives
of humans.)
Fig. #F1a (left):
A photograph of the entire skeleton taken from
the direction of the head. In this skeleton it is
worth to look at bones of the front left flipper visible
on side of the above skeleton just behind the end
of head of the whale, where it sticks out from almost
a human-like shoulder blade. A side view of this
left front flipper is shown on the photograph (b).
Fig. #F1b (right):
A photograph of bones from the left front flipper.
These front flippers in some whales are like
equivalents to human hands and fingers. In
fact, if someone had an opportunity to look
carefully at bones from front flippers in some
whales and dolphins, as this is shown on the
above photograph, then probably would notice
that they show a shocking similarity to bones
in hand palms and in five fingers from human
hands.
* * *
Notice that you can see the enlargement
of each illustration from this web site. For this, it suffices to click
on this illustration. Furthermore, most of the internet browsers that you may
use, including the popular "Internet Explorer",
allow also to download each illustration
to your own computer, where it can be looked at, reduced or enlarged to the
size that you may want, or printed with your own graphical software.
#F3.
Where is hiding this "missing link" - means where we lost the evolutionary ancestors of humans:
Deductions from previous items of this web
page begin to indicate increasingly clear,
where is lost this "missing link" from the evolution
of mankind. As these deductions indicate,
this missing link most probably hides where
no-one was seeking it before, namely on the
bottoms of seas and oceans amongst remains
of sea and water creatures.
This missing link in the evolution of man most
probably is the water creature popularly called
a "siren" or a "nymph", which still lived on
Earth in the initial period just after mankind was
settled in there. But then it either got extinct
by itself, or was destroyed on purpose in
the same manner as we know that e.g. was
destroyed the Neanderthal Man at the time
when God was settling humans on the Earth.
A whole range of data which we know from
mythology, points to the fact that creatures
which in human myths are described under
the name of "sirens" and "nymphs" most
probably are these "missing links" - means
are evolutionary ancestors of the man. For
example, we know that these creatures had
a high intelligence, and that they developed
beginning of the speech. After all, the mythology
frequently indicates that these sirens used
to "sing" loudly. (From this singing probably
the name for present warning alarm sirens
was coined.) It is also known that these creatures were
very similar to humans. Supposedly female sirens
had the shape, appearance, and sexual organs
so similar to these from human women, that
old time sailors used them as substitutes for
women. Furthermore, these sirens are NOT at
all products of human imagination, because they
exists in mythologies of almost every nation on
Earth. In turn, on the example of the German
archaeologist-hobbyist, Heinrich Schliemann,
who in 1870 managed to locate the ancient
Troy just on basis of mythology, is already
known that mythology is in fact a spoken history,
only that for some reasons these evil powers
mentioned in item #J3 of this web page do
not want people consider the historic truths
which spoken mythology tries to pass to us.
Part #G:
Consequences of determining that dolphins and whales are closest still alive relatives of humans:
#G1.
If whales and dolphins are the closest still alive animal relatives of humans, then
how we should respond to people and countries which kill and eat these relatives:
I personally believe that according to criteria
of scientific proving, the logical structure of
this web page in combination with the evidence
presented in item #F2, are practically
equivalent to a proof that dolphins and whales
are really closest still alive animal relatives of
humans. In such a situation one may wonder
how to treat these people and countries, like
Japan, Iceland, or Norway, which hunt whales
and dolphins and eat their meat. My reply
is simple. The killing and eating of these our
animal relatives is the same expression of
savagery and insensitiveness, as killing and
eating people. Thus practically a duty of every
inhabitant of the Earth is to persuade these
countries and such people which kill whales and
dolphins, to stop such practices. In this persuading
we should not refrain from any steps which
lie in our capabilities, e.g. from writing,
demonstrating, boycotting, etc.
The discussed countries murder a huge number
of these our animal relatives every year.
For example, in the article "Call to halt annual
dolphin slaughter", published on page B5 of
the New Zealand newspaper
"The Dominion Post",
issue dated on Wednesday, November 22, 2006,
is explained that in autumn and winter 2006 fishermen
in Japan are going to kill for meat around 21000
dolphins (in previous years a similar number
of these intelligent relatives of people probably
was killed over there). In turn, in the article "NZ joins
global action on Iceland's whaling", published on
page A11 of the New Zealand newspaper
"The New Zealand Herald",
issue dated on Thursday, November 2, 2006,
is revealed that in 2006 Iceland intends to kill 9
fin whales and 30 minke whales. (Iceland officially
returned to whale hunting in 2006, although
it hunts whales already since 2003 "for scientific
purposes" (similarly like Japan). Before for two
decades Island refrained from whale hunting.)
Part #H:
Why genetic codes are useless in proving the relationship of people to dolphins and whales:
#H1.
What really are genetic codes:
Genetic codes in fact are kinds of algorithmic
records expressed in a special language,
which inform how exactly a given individual
should be formed. Illustratively they could
be described as Godly equivalent to present
technical drawings used by today industry
for documenting designs of specific products.
#H2.
Why in genetic codes we still see relation of people to monkeys instead of relation of people to whales or dolphins:
At this point the reader probably asks himself a
question, why a possible close relationship of people
to whales and dolphins is not indicated to us
by experts in genetics. As it turns out, the reason
for this lack of indication from genetics is the
very nature of genetic codes, and also the "holistic"
manner in which present experts of genetics
determine the relationship of species by comparing
entire structures of their genetic codes. If one
analyses the manner on which genetic codes
are used today for establishing blood relatives,
it turns out that it is similar to a "holistic" manner
in which present people are establishing relationships
between two songs, paintings, products, etc., (e.g.
during arguments about plagiarism), instead
of being similar to the decoding and analysing
of the content, utilised e.g. when scientists try
to establish mutual relationship of two copies
of ancient Bibles. Namely, considered is only
the similarity of the entire genetic codes, means
the similarity of their entire structure, instead
of the decoding and analysing these sections
of the codes which contain the records of
genealogies of given species. In turn such
"holistic" comparison of codes hides in itself
a basic definition error. Namely, compared are
only the final products of the evolution, instead
of comparing with each other the paths by
which the evolution arrived to these final
products. On the other hand, someone's
true blood relation is the result of the same
evolutionary path, not the result of final
similarities at the end of this path. (For
example, Mr. Smith is related to Mr. Brown
only if the historic documentation confirms
that they have common ancestors,
grand-ancestors, etc. - not when by a
coincidence they are looking alike.)
I am going to explain now on several analogies
and examples, the nature of the error which is
hidden in such a "holistic" comparison of genetic
codes. From their definition,
genetic codes are simply descriptions of all
details of the design, appearance, and operation
of bodies of given creatures, expressed in a special
"genetic language". Thus, they are natural analogies
to e.g. present design documentation (technical
drawings) used by subsequent factories to document
exact design and production of, let say, cars.
As I explain this illustratively in next paragraph,
genetic codes are a kind of program, written
in a special genetic programming language,
which (the program) expresses precisely how
a given individual supposed to look like, what
should be the design and the operation of every
tiny detail of his or her cells, how his or her body
supposed to operate and behave - e.g. age, etc.
Means, these codes are, amongst others, shaped
by conditions in which a given individual lives,
and also by the appearance and by the design
of this individual, however not by its genealogy.
For this reasons, entire genetic codes can be only
a basis for establishing the relationship (and only this
close one) within a given species (e.g. how
father and children are related). But these entire codes
cannot be used for establishing the blood relationship
(or genealogy) between separate species (e.g. how
closely eels relate to water snakes). Especially
if these separate species have a similar appearance
and operation of their bodies, and also if they
live in similar conditions. In case of separate
species, entire genetic codes more reflect the similarities
of their design, appearance, and the environment
in which these species prefer to live, than their
actual blood relationship which result from their
genealogy. Expressing this in other words, the
fact that genetic codes of e.g. monkeys and people
are very similar when compared "holistically", does
NOT mean that both these creatures are truly related
to each other. The similarity of their entire genetic codes
simply means, that because of the evolutionary formation
of similar final shapes, and also because of their lives
in similar environments and conditions, as well as
because of having similar behaviours, monkeys
and people completely independently from each
other developed genetic codes which when compared
"holistically" look very similar. But if anyone in
fact undertook an effort of comparing genetic
codes in e.g. eels and in sea snakes, which
also indicate many mutual similarities - although
originate from drastically
different evolutionary chains, then would discover
that their entire genetic codes are almost the same
close to each other as these in monkeys and
in humans. The reason for this state of things I
am going to explain on the following illustrative
analogy.
In a similar manner as the entire genetic codes
are the reflection of anatomy and the behaviour
for subsequent species of creatures, also e.g.
in computers the so-called "source programs"
prepared in a specific programming language
are the reflection of the anatomy and operation
of these programs. So if someone analyses "holistically"
such a source program written in a given programming
language e.g. for an editor from "Macintosh"
computers, and also analyses such a source program
for e.g. an editor from "PC" computers, then would come to a
conclusion that these two editors are more mutually
related than they are related to e.g. operating systems
in their own computers. Of course, this would be not true.
After all, the only thing that really is related between
these two editors, are first computers on Earth from
which evolved their computers and then their codes.
So in fact the source program e.g. for an editor in
"PC" would be more related to the operating system
in this "PC" than to an editor in "Macintosh". However,
the similar operation of both editors, and similar
circumstances in which both these editors are used,
and also a similar manner in which the programming
language reflects this operation and circumstances,
causes that both these editors look as if they are
mutually related. Similarly is with the entire genetic codes
of monkeys and whales. The similarities of entire genetic
codes of monkeys and people results mainly from
the "genetic language" in which these codes are
expressed, and from the similarities of the anatomy
and behaviours of monkeys in comparison to humans.
But if we could establish the true genealogy of these
creatures, then it would turn out, that the closest
alive relatives of humans still remain whales and
dolphins - in spite that because of the different
anatomy, operation, and behaviour this is not
reflected in holistic structure of their genetic codes.
Let us summarise here the above presentation.
It puts forward a highly intriguing thesis of vital
consequences for our knowledge about the
origins of humans, which was overlooked so-far
in matters of genetics. This thesis states that
the present holistic treatment of genetic codes
of people, which avoids the learning and decoding
of the content of these codes expressed in a
special "genetic language", reveals only similarities
in the design (e.g. anatomy) of a given individual, but
fails to indicate useful information about the history
of development (genealogy) of the entire specie to
which this individual belongs.
Is there any evidence which confirms the truth
of the above thesis? As it turns out,
there is such evidence. For example,
it is a close similarity of genetic codes in all people
who live on our planet. As it is revealed by the
research of genetic codes of people, all humans
who populate our planet presently have codes so similar to
each other, as if all people on Earth are descendants
of one person who lived only around two to three
thousand years ago. (A popular summary of
scientific articles on this subject, which appeared in
the Journal "Nature", supplemented with interviews
with authors of these articles, was published in the
article "Tie that binds us all", which appeared in the
New Zealand newspaper
"The Dominion Post",
issue dated on Monday, July 3, 2006, page B1.)
This in turn means, that the structure of entire genetic
codes of subsequent people is NOT able to transmit
any useful information about the genealogy beyond
the time-span of around three thousand years. So
this structure do not contain any data
about the genealogy of people from times when the
evolution of people took place (after all, this evolution
was much earlier than 3 thousand years ago). Thus the
holistic comparison of genetic codes cannot be used
for defining the blood relationship of subsequent species
(i.e. genealogy of species), but only can be utilised for
defining close relationships within given species - and
only under the condition that the time-span between
periods, when the investigated individuals were alive,
is not too large.
#H3.
If the "holistic" treatment of genetic codes to-date disqualifies their use for for establishing relation of species, then where we should seek evidence for the relation of people to whales and dolphins:
Because, according to the explanations
from item #H2 above,
until the time when people learn exactly the
"language of genetic codes", the genetic
codes treated "holistically" cannot be used
for determining the genealogy and mutual
relationship between different species, at
the present level of our knowledge we need
to seek various other indicators of this
genealogy and relationship. In item
#H4 I try to point the attention of the reader
onto several commonly known such indicators.
These indicators document that actually people
are related the most closely to whales and dolphins.
Simultaneously, these indicators exclude the possibility
that monkeys and people are related as closely
as present evolutionists claim this. (Of course,
we cannot forget that ALL mammals are somehow
related to each other.)
#H4.
Is there a possibility, that in the future a tiny section of the genetic codes
will be discovered, which contains the record of genealogy of given species:
In item #H2 of this web page is explained
that at the present level of our knowledge
one cannot use "holistic" comparison of
genetic codes for establishing genealogy
and relationship of subsequent species. But this
explanation does NOT try to claim, that genetic
codes will never be used for establishing this
relationship and genealogy. Rather opposite,
in item #H3 of this web page a clue was indicated,
that these codes contain a tiny section, in
which the history and genealogy of a given
species of creatures are recorded. This
section still remains unknown to present
scientists. It causes that for every species
the "ontogenesis repeats the filogenesis'
way" - for details see (5) in item #F2 of
this web page. Only that to decode this tiny
section of the genetic code, the fulfilment
by researchers of two conditions is necessary.
Namely, firstly they need to learn exactly the
unique "language" in which genetic codes
are formulated. Secondly they need to concentrate
on the exact decoding of the descriptions provided
in the genetic language for the genealogy of
given species recorded in this specific tiny
section of the genetic code. The truth about
the origin of someone cannot be simply
established just by a comparison of entire
genetic codes of subsequent species, but
requires laborious decoding of this tiny
and well hidden section of the code.
This tiny section of the genetic code, in which
the records of the genealogy of a given species
is provided, can be compared to a small inscription
in the corner of technical diagrams for e.g. a car,
in which the genealogy of this car is explained
(e.g. which states from which other car a given car
originates). Or it can be compared to a small
comment in a source code of an editor, which
(the comment) explains the history of this editor.
I personally believe that
God
intentionally left for us such a message written in
the "language of genetic codes", and also that
He intentionally provided us with the clue where
to look for it, in the form of this principle that
"ontogenesis repeats the filogenesis' way".
Only that, similarly as God always does this
with every truth, He thoroughly hide this
truth from our sight. (We need to remember
the Polish proverb, that "truth hides on
the bottom of well" - meaning that one
firstly needs to draw a lot of useless "water"
before one gets to the truth hidden beneath it.)
I personally believe that humanity just approaches
the time when this special tiny section of the genetic
codes is decoded. After all, only by this can be
explained the stubbornness and determination
with which
evil powers
that hide from people the truth about origins
of the mankind, in recent times try to destroy on
Earth the last relatives of humans (i.e. whales
and dolphins). It is probably because of this,
that servants of these evil powers push so
hard to be allowed to hunt whales industrially,
and also probably for this reason dolphins are
destroyed so fast and quickly seem to disappear
from the entire our planet.
Part #I:
The role of "genetic codes" in shaping future of given living creatures:
#I1.
"Genetic codes" as carriers of "programs of life and fate" for all living creatures:
Time which prevails in our physical world
is in fact a kind of reversible software time.
This is why this time can be shifted back.
In item #B3 of the web page
timevehicle.htm - about mechanism of time, shifting time back, and about time vehicles,
this software reversible time is defined in
the following manner: time is the flow
of execution control through sequence of
elementary commands in natural programs
of our lives. In living creatures these
"natural programs of life" are contained in
the double helixes of their DNA (i.e. in the
genetic code of a given creature). As we know
from mechanics, the helixes are extremely
interesting mechanical forms - especially
susceptible for vibrations and for resonances.
After all "springs" known to everyone is just
a material representation of just such helixes.
And we know how susceptible is every "spring"
to vibrations and to falling into resonances.
Perhaps the reader saw sometimes a kind
of a large and very flexible spring, as under
the influence of its ability to resonate it just
by itself "walks in rhythmical steps" down of
stairs. Well, the double "spring" of DNA has
just the same ability. Means, it can like "walk
down of stairs" - but it does NOT need any
staircase for this walking. In the result of this
like "walking down stairs" the double helix of
DNA is exciting to resonance with the so-called
"timespace" atom after atom from its own
structure. In turn the resonating a given atom
of DNA causes that a section of the "program
of life" is executed which is stored in a given
atom of DNA. In this manner, step-by-step,
our program of life is executed in jumps. In
turn the consequence of this "jumping" execution
of the program is that we ourselves "pass through
time in short jumps". Therefore if someone wishes
to shift his or her time back, it is sufficient to shift
back own vibratory resonance to the initial atoms
of the DNA. This shifting back vibrations depends
simply on subjecting a given person (or other living
creature) to action of the magnetic field which
vibrates with the precisely controlled frequency
and curve of changes in time. The device which
generates just such a magnetic field is called the
"time vehicle". Description of principles of operation
of this device is presented in item #C2 of the web page
immortality.htm - about the access of people to immortality and to lives that never end.
The above descriptions have this attribute, that
they explain also, amongst others, what exactly
are so-called "genes" in the light of the
theory of everything called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity.
This theory defines "genes" in the following manner:
genes are finite sections of natural "programs
of life and fate" which completely define closed
periods in the life of a given creature.
So in the sense of their function, "genes" represent
equivalents of what the area of computer sciences
called "Software Engineering" names "subprograms"
or "procedures". This means, "genes" are composite
"modules" in a much larger "program of life and fate"
for a given creature. While natural "programs of life
and fate" describe the entire life of a given creature,
individual "genes" describe clearly distinguishable
"stages" or "periods" in this life and fate. God utilises
these "genes" as kinds of ready-made "building blocks"
from which He automatically pieces together the modular
course of the entire life of a given creature. Because
these "subprograms" called "genes" describe specific
sections of the life and fate of every creature, depending
what according to this section of the fate is to happen
then to a given creature, present scientists assume that some
"genes" are responsible e.g. for someone's heart attack
or for a specific form of cancer, other "genes" - for
becoming a drug addict or for a mental disorder. However,
one day in the future scientists will also discover with
a shock, that there are "genes" which are "responsible"
e.g. for someone being hit by a car, getting shot, or
drowning in a river. Of course, as so-far scientists did NOT
drop yet onto the idea of carrying out genetic comparisons
in victims of specific categories of accidents or deaths.
The reason for which I am explaining all this above,
is to realise that genetic codes are NOT at all the
description of mutual relationships between subsequent
living creatures, but carriers of "programs of life and
fate" for these creatures. Of course, these programs
of life and fate describe also, amongst others" parents
of a given creature, and also illnesses which are to
affect it and imperfections in its body. As such, these
programs of life and fate can also serve, amongst
others, to determine the closest relationships between
given creatures.
Part #J:
Yet another joke and simulation of God, i.e. the "cosmic origins of humanity":
#J1.
Cosmic relatives of people - means another makeup story (or joke) of God, that is being passed off unto people:
As it turns out, the imagination and creative
ability of God are incomparably more exuberant
from these in people. Also God clearly likes
to "treat" people with makeup stories. It turns out
that the "simulated history of the universe and man"
described on this web page is NOT the only
invented story which God presently spreads
amongst people. Still another such a story
concerns UFOnauts. Although so-far people
do NOT want to officially notice it, there is
a huge pool of evidence which documents
that the appearance of UFOnauts and UFOs
on the Earth is also simulated by God.
Examples from this huge pool of evidence
is shown on totaliztic web pages
ufo_proof.htm - about scientific proof that UFOs do exist objectively and are already completed Magnocrafts,
evidence.htm - about the body of evidence for the real activities of UFOnauts and UFOs on the Earth, and
explain.htm - about scientific interpretation of authentic photographs of UFOs.
As it indicated the research carried according
to totalizm, these UFOnauts, and also everything
that is linked to them (e.g. UFO vehicles), are
also simulated by God with a supernatural realism.
Descriptions of these simulations are presented,
amongst others, in items #F7 and #F8 of the
totaliztic web page
evil.htm - about origins of all evil on the Earth,
and in items #D2 to #D5 of the totaliztic web page
ufo.htm - with scientific replies to fundamental questions regarding UFOnauts and UFO vehicles - i.e. whether they do exist, how they function, etc..
So it is clear, that in His efforts to groom the effective
seekers of truths, God prepared a whole series of
various simulations, the goals of all of which is to teach
humans to distinguish between truth and shams
or simulations. To be honest, this simulation of
UFOnauts and UFOs by God is so realistic, that
myself I was fooled by it for many years.
The research of totalizm indicates, that all the
"evidence" about the supposed origins of
humanity from the distant planet "Terra", that
is described in further parts of this web page,
is simulated by God and manifested to people.
It probably supposed to convince us, that all
creatures which exist on the Earth were brought
to Earth from the planet Terra. Means, all the
Earthly living creatures supposedly represent
only creatures that used to live on Terra,
means which in times when they were brought
to the Earth represented the final links from their
evolutionary chains. This in turn supposed to
suggest to hardened atheistic researchers, that
even if we do NOT have these so-called "missing
links" still the "natural evolution" is possible. In turn
the direct ancestors of the man, means sirens,
were brought to the Earth. But the ancestors of
these ancestors, means creatures from which
evolved whales (and dolphins), as well as sirens,
not necessarily needed to still exists on Terra
at that time and be brought to Earth in time of
the supposed preparation of Earth for colonisation.
Due to such a clever "simulation", "atheists"
receive a "scientific" justification, that the
ancestors of these "missing links" in fact
never appeared on Earth, but disappeared
when the first humans supposedly blasted
apart their home planet "Terra".
#J2.
What makeup "evidence" is passed to us in order to suggest that the humanity originates from the planet "Terra" not from the Earth:
The matter of origins of the mankind is made
even more complicated by information that
originates from UFOnauts. It turns out that
UFOnauts arriving to the Earth claim that they
are close relatives of humans. They also insist
that the human race does not originate
from Earth, but was brought here from the
planet "Terra" which already does not exist
(by some of them the name of this planet
is also pronounced as "Nerra"). This planet
Terra was located in the Vega system from
the constellation of the Libra. An example
of one out of such "leaks of information"
from UFOnauts is provided in subsection
B3 from the Polish treatise
[3b] -
see in there paragraph numbered {5500}.
Humanity, and also animals and plants,
supposedly were brought to the planet
Earth from the planet Terra in order to
colonise the Earth. But in the result of
man-made cataclysms which supposedly
were induced by cosmic relatives of
humans after the colonisation of Earth,
people apparently lost the knowledge about
their true roots and ancestors. Here is
the list of the most important categories
of evidence which again seems to be
passed off upon us, and which supposed
to convince us to the claims of UFOnauts
that the humanity originates from the planet "Terra".
(1)
Gravity equations and attributes of humans described by them.
In subsection JE9 from volume 9 of monograph
[1/4]
several equations were derived and interpreted, which
carry the general name of "gravity equations". They
express the relationship between the gravity of the
planet on which a given race of creatures does live,
and such attributes of these creatures as their
size (height), weight, feelings, intelligence, or longevity.
For example, according to these equations, when the
man would evolve on the planet with gravity around
4 times greater than the gravity of the planet from which
humanity originates, then his height would be around
16 times lower than the height of people, while the intelligence
would be around 16 times higher than the intelligence of
people on Earth. And as I explained this in subsections
P6.2 to P6.4 from volume 13 of monograph [1/4],
all parameters of the human body (e.g. the non-utilised
potential of the human brain, and also the longevity of
Adam and Eve), seem to document that the humanity
could originate from a planet the gravity of which was
over 4 times greater than the gravity of Earth.
(2)
The arrivals of UFOnauts with anatomy almost identical
to anatomy of typical people. By now in the UFO
literature a huge body of evidence was collected, which
document the fact that on UFO vehicles, amongst others,
beings apparently arrive to Earth, who look undistinguishingly
identical to people from the Earth. Practically almost every
UFO book which reviews several cases of close encounters
with UFOnauts, indicates this surprising similarity to humans
of the anatomy of some UFOnauts. The best example of just
such a documentation is an excellent book [1T1] by Professor
John E. Mack, M.D., entitled: "Abduction - human
encounters with aliens", Ballantine Books - a division
of Random House, Inc., New York, May 1995,
ISBN 0-345-39300-7, Library of Congress Card Number
93-38116, volume 464 pages (available also in translation
to Polish under the title: "Uprowadzenia - spotkania
ludzi z kosmitami"). Several examples from this area
are also presented in subsection T4 from volume 14
of monograph [1/4], as well as in the mentioned before
Polish treatise
[3b] -
both these publications are available for free downloading
via this web page.
(3)
The use of name "Terra" in ancient languages, e.g. in Greek.
In languages of antiquity, e.g. in the Greek language,
the name "Terra" was assigned to the planet on which
humans live. This may suggest that the name "Terra" was the
remainder from times when the humanity still was aware
of the supposedly cosmic origin of people from the planet Terra.
(4)
Folklore and mythology, which describes the supposed
origins of humanity from the planet "Terra" and the settling
expedition of humanity through cosmos which proceeded the
colonisation of Earth. Such legends and stories
exist in many races and corners of the Earth. Their
examples include mythology of New Zealand Maoris,
or legends of the African tribe of Dogons.
(5)
An apparent counter-evolution of humanity that supposedly
took place in antiquity, when the human knowledge went
from the technical advancement towards the wilderness.
For example, initially people knew how to build pyramids,
shift mountains, and build flying machines (vimanas),
but with the elapse of time they forget even how to
produce metals. For more details see subsection
P6.5 from volume 13 of monograph [1/4].
(6)
The description of Eden which coincides with the design
of a telekinetic UFO type K7. If one thoroughly
analyses the mythology about the Eden, then it turns
out that the name "Eden" was assigned to a flying
vehicle similar to the
Magnocraft
(and a UFO) type K7. The same mythology indicates
simultaneously, that relatives of humanity who
originally brought Adam and Eve to Earth in this vehicle
called "Eden", in fact had towards them very bad intentions
which are described more extensively on the web page
evil.
For more details see subsection P6.1 from volume 13 of
monograph [1/4].
Much more information about the possibility
revealed to us by a rapidly growing number
of "facts", that man was supposedly brought
to Earth from a different planet "Terra", is
provided in subsections JE9 and P6 from
volumes respectively 9 and 13 of monographs
[1/4] or
[1/5].
I recommend having a look at these subsections.
#J3.
How the to-date history of humans would look like, if people really originated from the planet Terra:
If in fact one takes under account and
synthesises into a single body all these
fragmented information about the origin
of mankind, which are passed off upon
us from various independent sources,
then it turns out that this origin of humans
looks much more complicated than either
the disciples of evolution, or disciples of
creation, explain this in the simplicity and
naivety of their imaginations. Namely,
according to this evidence that is passed
off upon us, the humanity supposed to
"evolve" on the planet called "Terra" -
which already does not exist. (First
humans who inhabited it have blown
it up during one amongst numerous their wars.)
Then people supposedly colonised a whole
chain of further planets, until finally they
arrived to the Earth. Before the colonisation
of the Earth, humans prepared it to their
arrival by sewing on it almost all living organisms
which still existed on the planet Terra. But after
the arrival to Earth, humans supposedly were
exposed to many destructive cataclysms which
supposed to be induced technically by our
evil
relatives. In the result of these cataclysms, the
humanity supposedly lost the knowledge of its
own roots and history. Only presently humanity
supposed to rebuild this knowledge. (In order
to increase the realism of such a "simulation", as
this rebuilding of knowledge takes place on Earth, the
evil
relatives of humans treat this rebuilding as a serious threat to
their exploitation of Earth, so they again unleashed
all these destructive cataclysms which supposed to
repeat the destruction of our present human civilisation.)
In past I contributed my own effort to the development
of just this line of thinking. But now I do hope that this
web page is going to be my contribution towards
realising "what really is going on".
In order to learn more about this passed off upon
us "simulated history of mankind", it is worth to read
subsection V3 from volume 16 of monograph
[1/4].
Part #K:
Evidence for the absurdity of the
lies spread lately, that these were
UFOnauts
(i.e. "intelligent designers") who
genetically fabricated humans:
#K1.
The power behind UFOnauts has several "hidden agendas" in spreading on the Earth the lie that these were UFOnauts who genetically fabricated the man:
Motto:
If "intelligent designers" fabricated the humanity, then who fabricated these "intelligent designers",
which fabricated "designers" of these "intelligent designers", etc., etc.
Item #J1 this web page explains to us the
finding of totalizm that the so-called "UFOnauts"
are simply software "simulations" temporary
materialised on the Earth in order to accomplish
specific goals. Thus, we even more should
be beware of the situation, that in recent
years increasingly more so-called
"authorities" started to promote a deceiving
lie, that these
UFOnauts
(not God) fabricated the mankind.
Supposedly UFOnauts used "genetic
engineering" for this purpose.
But if someone traces origins
of this another fable, then it turns
out that it is spread by these "simulated"
UFOnauts. For example, the movement
promoted on Earth by UFOnauts and called
Raelians,
openly admits that the information
about the genetic engineering of
people by UFOnauts these Raelians
received from UFOnauts themselves.
Unfortunately, even if we overlook the fact
that UFOnauts are just "simulations", still
the existing evidence contradicts that
they were able to genetically fabricate humans.
For example, the only thing that UFOnauts
can do, is to leave a bloody trail on the
Earth, through occupying and exterminating
humanity from the beginnings of times.
They also are famous from chronic lying.
Not without valid reasons old-timers used
to call them "devils" - as this is revealed
on a whole range of web sites of totalizm,
e.g. on web pages
evil.htm - about origins of all evil on the Earth,
ufo.htm - about evil UFOnauts,
military_magnocraft.htm - about destructive uses of UFO vehicles,
evidence.htm - about evidence of UFO activities on Earth,
changelings.htm - about UFOnauts-changelings,
day26.htm - about tsunami on 26 December 2004,
predators.htm - about predators,
wtc.htm - about collapsing WTC,
landslips.htm - about causing destructive landslips and mudslides,
hurricane.htm - about making hurricanes,
tornado.htm - about technically induced tornadoes,
katrina.htm - about technically induced hurricane Katrina,
tapanui.htm - about explosion near Tapanui,
katowice_uk.htm - about collapsing the hall in Katowice,
shuttle.htm - about downing the space shuttle Columbia,
malbork_uk.htm - about castle in Malbork, etc.
Therefore every information which
originates from UFOnauts themselves
always needs to be treated with
a special caution and suspicion.
Especially that in the case of
this another lie disseminated
lately by UFOnauts themselves,
that supposedly UFOnauts fabricated
humanity, a whole list of nasty
"hidden agendas" is embedded.
For example, through disseminating
this lie UFOnauts accomplish
following hidden goals:
(a)
Cunningly pass with it the warning to humans,
which scares people what happens if the humanity
tries to free itself from UFOnauts' hidden occupation
of the Earth. This scaring takes the form of a
following threat "since in past we were able to
create you, if you are naughty then we create
another race with which we replace you."
(b)
UFOnauts add a significance to their hidden
occupation of the Earth and humanity.
After all, this their fable that they fabricated
humans, has the significance of saying
"look folks, we created you, so you are
owning us a thanks that you exist at all."
(c)
They scare humanity with the level of their
knowledge. This fable about the fabrication
of humanity contains also a hidden information
that "we are powerful like gods - do not
dare to stand up against us."
(d)
They indirectly tell us, that UFOnauts are
different from people. So this statement
is a kind of condemnation of reports of people
abducted to UFOs, who claim that in these UFOs
they saw creatures undistinguishing identical
to people. After all, in the relationship to
people the lie that UFOnauts fabricated humans,
has a meaning identical to stating that
"these people who report what they saw
in UFOs must lie, because we created
people - so we cannot be identical to
people."
(e)
Adding the merit to claims spread
by UFOnauts all over the Earth, that
God
supposedly does NOT exists. UFOnauts
put a lot of effort in spreading atheism
on the Earth. Thus their claim that these were
them who created people, is equivalent to
the claim that "God does NOT exist, because
it was us who fabricated people".
#K2.
Evidence spread all over the Earth which documents
that if UFOnauts really carry out any genetic engineering,
they are able to genetically mutate only monsters
which are physically deformed and highly unhappy:
If someone carefully analyses traces of
supposed "genetic" creativity of UFOnauts
implanted all over the Earth, then results
are shocking. Namely, it then turns out
that there is a large body of evidence
implanted all over the Earth that UFOnauts
supposedly experimented with genetic
engineering on people in past.
But products of these experiments
are simulated as deformed and unhappy
monsters with enormously twisted
psychology. For example, one of
such a monster is shown in "Fig. #K2"
below. It is a female genetic composite
of a human, in which normal human
hands and legs were replaced with
genetic implants from clawed legs
of some lizards of pray - perhaps
from a specie of crocodiles or "comodo dragons".
As it turns out, these human composites
with "clawed paws" are manifested
on the Earth for thousands of years,
"helping" UFOnauts in the secret exploitation
of our planet. In old times they
used to freely shown to people.
Therefore their images are
known in practically all cultures
of the world. Presently they are
stopped from being shown to
people on the Earth. However, they
are still manifested on UFO decks
quite frequently. Because of the
kind of snake-like or crocodile-like
pattern that they have on their
skin, people abducted to UFOs
usually describe them as "lizards".
The race of these monsters is manifested
for a long time. It is simulated as if it already
multiplies all by itself on the planet that it
supposedly occupies. It is also shown as
if it is too late to rectify now the supposed
error of UFOnauts with the creation of this
race. But from the physical point of view,
this race is shown to us as a very clumsy
creatures, mentally highly unstable, deviated,
and unhappy. For example, in all other
creations, the both sexes of which make
love to each other, try to be kind to
each other during the intercourse and
soon afterwards. However, these unhappy
creatures are extremely brutal to their
lovers. Before the intercourse and during
the course of it they fight a real battle,
while after the intercourse they try
to physically mutilate each other.
The folklore of the "Berawan" tribe
from jungles of Borneo describes these
females with crocodile's claws (called "kokelir"
by them) that they already during the
intercourse scratch and tear apart their
lovers, while after the intercourse they
bite their balls off. In turn the folklore
from Italy calls them "wild women-cats".
It claims that after the intercourse these
female "women-cats" typically tear apart
their lovers - if these lovers do not
manage to run away fast. In turn Greek
myths describe extremely dangerous
"Harpies", the all attributes of which
also correspond to the behaviour of these
clawed "devils" and their female versions.
Sources for the physical clumsiness and
mental unhappiness of these monsters, supposedly
created genetically by UFOnauts, is the short-sightedness
of their creators. Giving them crocodile's
claws may seem to be an excellent idea
to the genetic engineers in times when
these creatures still lived on trees and ate
bulls alive - which they torn apart with
their claws. But these claws become
redundant in later times. After all,
as it happens to all intelligent beings,
the civilization level of these monsters
gradually must raise with the elapse of time.
In turn, it is not comfortable to walk on
streets of cities on eagle's clawed legs,
nor operate a machine with three-finger
clawed hands. So in spite that theoretically
speaking such highly advanced UFOnauts
can acquire the ability to implant genetically
to people organs of selected animals, still these
UFOnauts always will lack the far-sightedness
and wisdom of God. So whatever UFOnauts
are going to design, it is to be short-sighted -
means good only for a short time, and
for specific environmental conditions
only. In turn when times or conditions
change, the monsters created by UFOnauts
turn out to be just that, means clumsy
and unhappy monsters.
Of course, the list of monsters supposedly generated
genetically by UFOnauts does NOT finish
on these "three-finger devils with crocodile's
claws". In medieval times a whole range
of other kinds of them were manifested on
the Earth. For example, then also existed hoofed
monsters, and similar goat-horned monsters.
Hoofed monsters from the belt upward had
appearance of people, while from the
belt downward had the appearance of
goats. To their examples belong, amongst
others, "hoofed devils" widely known
in the medieval times, and also
"satyrs" from the ancient Greek.
The ancient Greek knows also the
goat-footed god "Pan". In turn
horned monsters include, amongst
others, medieval horned devils.
Furthermore, horned was also the
German god Wotan, and the god of
Vikings named Odin which travelled
on the "flying horse" called
Sleipnir (a UFO vehicle?).
Horns had also Moses (the one
which took Israelis from Egypt) -
which the fact is immortalized even
on the sculpture of Michael Angelo
"Moses" (to be seen in the church
San Pietro in Vincoli in Rome).
Furthermore, on one English documentary
film about Alexander the Great it
was claimed that this Macedonian
monarch also had small horns - the
fact of which is supposedly recorded
even in Koran. (Such information
induces in us a question, who actually
was Moses and Alexander the Great - i.e.
were they horned versions of present
UFOnauts-changelings.)
Every place on the Earth knows further
mutated monsters of a partial characteristics
of a human. However, all of them were
just clumsy monsters. UFOnauts are
simulated as being too stupid to successfully
play God!
Fig. #K2:
Genetically engineered mutant which supposedly
is a result of short-sighted genetic experiments
of UFOnauts. It represents genetically
mutated monster which is a cross between
a human with genes of selected animals.
For example his hands and foots are
replaced with paws of a lizard of pray -
perhaps from a version of crocodile or comodo dragons.
Practically in all cultures of the
world this creature is known as a
"devil with cock's claws" - as an
example I suggest to recall the
poem "Pani Twardowska" of the Polish
poet named Adam Mickiewicz "... chicken
legs and cock's claws he had. ..."
On the above sculpture reflected is
a "female version" of this "devil".
In order to allow a better examination
of her wings and system of 3+1 clawed
fingers on hands and legs, she is
photographed from two directions.
Please notice that these "bat-like
wings" which this female devil has,
in fact are appropriately designed
"pelerines" which only assume the
shapes of wings when during the
flight this creature lifts her
hands up. The purpose of these
"wings" is to manoeuvre better
during flights in the air with
the use of a special so-called
personal propulsion system.
More information about this genetic
monster is presented on separate
web pages about the
church of St. Bobola in Milicz, and about the
castle in Malbork.
I should also mention here that soon after
I published the above photographs, UFOnauts
who secretly occupy the Earth removed
the above sculpture. Descriptions of this
unjustified removal are provided on the
web page about the
church of St. Bobola in Milicz.
The above figure of a "female devil"
originates from the culture of Pacific.
(I.e. a far east of the Earth.) But in
Poland just such creatures that have only
3+1 clawed fingers, were also known.
Descriptions of these are included into
folklore of practically every place on
Earth.
From every point of view the above creatures
are just clumsy monsters. For example,
mentally they are unstable and very unhappy
because they know that they are animal-like
humans. (Their psychology is explained
quite well in a novel and in a film based
on this novel, about a man who was created
by an evil doctor by sawing together organs
taken from dead people.) It explains why
these creatures irresistibly love raping
people. But after finishing such rapes
they mutilate their former lovers.
Therefore, e.g. intimidating warriors
of the tribe "Berawan" from tropical
jungles on the island of Borneo are
panicky afraid of these evil females
(called "kokelir" over there). They
know that when such females get hot
after seeing a human male, after the
sexual act they have a bad habit of
biting off balls of their former lover.
#K3.
Which evidence reveals that if even if UFOnauts really were our cosmic relatives, still they would be unable to fabricate humans genetically:
Motto:
"A creation never can replace the creator."
In spite of dissemination of lies by simulated
UFOnauts themselves that these were UFOnauts
who genetically designed and created
present inhabitants of the Earth (i.e.
that UFOnauts created humans), even
just a brief analysis proves that
these lies are complete nonsense.
So let us look now on the most
vital examples of evidence which
unambiguously documents that UFOnauts
never were able, and never will
be able, to create humans. Here
are examples of this evidence:
(i)
From the anatomy point of view UFOnauts
are in every aspect indistinguishably
identical to people - the fact of which
is supported by a huge body of evidence.
This means that UFOnauts could NOT create
humans, because then people would be
different from them. So in reality
their claimed "creation of humans"
looked that way, that one day they
simply caught several children of
isolated their own farmers and
shifted them to the Earth.
(ii)
The structure and functioning of the human
body shows a huge far-sightedness of which
UFOnauts are incapable. The human body
proves itself to be optimal and practical
in all conditions and in all times. Thus
the human body shows the wisdom and far-sightedness
of the one who controls the time - means
God. In turn whatever UFOnauts design
and what they form genetically through
compositions of genes stolen from various
God's creatures, always is a kind of
monster which is good just for one times
and for one kind of conditions. When the
time changes or conditions change, these
monsters become clumsy and unhappy.
(iii)
If it is true the claim of UFOnauts that
God does NOT exist and that these were
UFOnauts who created humans, then immediately
a next question rises, "who in this case
created UFOnauts". UFOnauts do NOT
provide, and in fact are unable to provide,
an answer to this next question.
(iv)
The entire body of evidence about genetic
engineering of UFOnauts documents, that
the only thing they are capable of, is to
form genetic composites of already existing
creatures. Means, UFOnauts were only able
to insert genes stolen from already existing
creatures, between human genes. For example,
by adding to genes of humans another genes
stolen from goats, they formed "Satyrs"
and "horned devils". But UFOnauts were
unable to evolve completely new kinds
of creatures, that never existed before.
This in turn means, that they were only
secondary "copying cats", and that they
are very far from skills of the original
creator. So for sure, they were unable to
create humans.
Part #L:
Similar simulations and jokes our young God plays much more for people:
#L1.
Let us count only these untrue simulations and jokes of God
that were analysed in the previous parts of this web page:
Only on this web page listed were and documented
numerous fabricated simulations and jokes played
for people by God. Let us try to count these here:
(1) Inventing and implanting into the physical
world the second (untrue) history of the universe
that includes, amongst others, the "big bang" and
the so-called "natural evolution".
(2) Inventing and passing off unto people the
"cosmic origins of the humanity" and the existence
of cosmic relatives of humans.
(3) Inventing, simulating, and periodical confronting
with people the extraordinary flying machines
which are called "UFO vehicles", as well as the
supernatural beings that control these machines
and that in past were called "devils", "dragons"
"serpents", "witches", etc., while presently are
called "UFOnauts".
(4) Periodical creation and passing off upon people
the clumsy monsters with shocking habits, an
example of which is shown on the sculpture from
"Fig. #K2" above.
So if we draw some general conclusion from the
above review, this conclusion would reveal a
rather humorous findings that our young
God likes to play jokes on people and
likes to confront people with highly inspirational
puzzles which He temporally simulates especially
for this purpose. Moreover, our God does
all this because He wants us to grow intellectually
through solving His puzzles, and He shows a great
disappointment when we do NOT respond to His
inspirational challenges.
#L2.
"Printer's imps" - means another large family of
continuous set-ups and jokes played on people
by God for important reasons:
My acquaintance from Germany (Rainhard)
is a professional printer that originates from
a family of many generations of printers. One
day he complained to me, that if an important
publication is printed, in which NOT supposed
to be any error, then no matter how thoroughly
it would be checked and improved, never all
errors can be eliminated from it. If a printer
removes one group of errors, then by the action
of some magical powers another group immediately
appears. This regularity Rainhard knew NOT
only from his own experiences, but also from
findings of past generations reported by his
father. Practically the matter of these printing
errors looks as if in printing shops secretly
acted some mischievous supernatural creatures
(in past called printer's imps) which
intentionally play tricks on printers.
Myself in my research also frequently encounter
this phenomenon. But because I write everything
on my computer, which also stores my works, in
my case the tricks of these "printer's imps" take
the forms of changes introduced to my texts after
I finish writing and close my computer. In past
these tricks of "printer's imps" used to make me
really upset and angry, as they used to leave
physical traces as if some "evil UFOnauts" at
nights secretly kept breaking into my computer.
But presently, when I discovered WHO really
hides behind these changes intentionally
introduced to texts that I am writing, I ceased
to worry and get upset about them.
In the computer discipline called "Software Engineering"
it is commonly known that the number of errors
contained in every computer program remains
approximately at the same level (i.e. is proportional
to the length of this program) - no matter how much
this program is tested and improved. This is because
when someone removes several out of these errors,
later it turns out that mysteriously in the same program
almost an equal number of new errors do appear.
So we could say, that these "printer's imps" act
also in computer programming. Practically their
mischievous activities can be detected in everything
that is vital for people, and that depends on writing.
#L3.
Illusive and perfectly masked evil-doers with
supernatural powers that act currently in Internet:
If someone takes part in any Internet discussions,
then he or she knows that also in Internet
act some exceptionally mischievous creatures
with supernatural powers. The existence of these
creatures I discussed in past in the
Google discussion group
(see topic number (1) from the item #M3 of the web page
immortality.htm - about the access of people to immortality and to lives that never end,
where it is worth to look in order to read more
about them.
#L4.
Manifestations of all these tricks and simulations played on people
by God, represent most noticeable physical evidence in support of the fact that
God really does exist:
Each one of us seeks a confirmation whether
God
really does exist. These manifestations of
jokes and tricks played on people by God
represent one amongst most clearly noticed
physical evidence for the existence and
activities of God.
Part #M:
What we can learn from findings of
totalizm
elaborated on this web page:
#M1.
Not only us, humans, but also God Himself is "relatively imperfect", thus He is continually learning and improving His methods:
A vital finding of the philosophy of
totalizm
elaborated on this web page, is the fact
that God is still very "young", because He
is "only" around 6000 years old, and thus
that God is also "relatively imperfect".
If we consider this thoroughly, such
"relative imperfection of God" introduces
"revolutionary" consequences. On one
hand it reveals to us the "human aspect
of God", which so-far was either overlooked,
or kept hidden, by religions. After all, as we
all probably are aware of it, all religions tell
people that "God exists since eternity and is perfect".
Only the philosophy of totalizm points our
attention at the information provided in the
Bible, which reveals to us that God self-evolved
just slightly more than 6000 years ago, and
that He is "relatively imperfect". In turn the
assumption of "eternal and perfect God" blocks
the humanity from an aware self-development,
deprives people justification for reasons they
exist, and hides the goal (i.e. "increasing the
knowledge") to the fulfilment of which people supposed
to serve. In turn God which utilises us people
for self-development and for the increase of
perfection of the entire intelligent universe,
is not only the concept highly innovative,
but also a concept which justifies our existence,
explains our own imperfections, and also
which inspires us to increase our efforts towards
accumulation of knowledge and lifting level
of our civilisation. Furthermore, the knowledge
of the fact that God is "young" and still "relatively
imperfect" explains to us many phenomena
which we notice in our surrounding, for example
it explains: (1) a kind of "continuous experiment"
which God completes with people, (2) the lack
of perfections in methods of God's governing
over human societies, (3) the need to create
people as highly imperfect creatures, (4) the
necessity to inspire people for work and to
creativity via almost a "deception" of the type
of "simulated history of the universe and man"
described on this web page, or via methods
of the "carrot and stick" type described in
item #D1 of the web page
god.htm - about scientific answers of secular philosophy of totalizm for basic questions regarding God,
(5) the need to maintain people in the lack of
certainty about the God's existence - described
in item #D1 of the web page
ufo.htm - with answers to fundamental questions regarding UFOnauts and UFO vehicles - e.g. whether they do exist, how they function, etc.,
and a whole array of other, previously
misunderstood, phenomena.
Of course, while stating that "God is relatively imperfect",
we also have the duty to exactly define, what the
terminology "relative imperfection" actually means
in His case. After all, if we compare quantitatively
e.g. the knowledge of God to the knowledge of let
us say "the most wise human", then the difference
is so immense that mathematicians probably would
describe it as "infinitive". This is because God
knows much more than knew in total all people
together that so-far lived on the Earth. But if we
compare quantitatively the entire knowledge which
God has today, with the entire knowledge that
the same God had 6 thousands years ago (i.e.
around the time when God created the "physical
world" and man), then it turns out that during last
6000 years the knowledge of God at least doubled,
if not increased many fold. Proofs for this fact
are, amongst others, statements of the Bible, and
also the content of holy books of Hinduism. In other
words, by a "relative imperfection of God" this
web page understands the imperfection which God
would display today if we could compare the present
knowledge of God with His knowledge that is going
to appear in a distant future - let us say after one
million years. A comprehensive discussion
how exactly we should understand the "relative
imperfection of God", together with examples of
evidence that "God created man to be able
continually increase His knowledge", is presented
in item #B4 of the totaliztic web page
will.htm - about impact of "free will" on fate of the entire humanity.
Knowing the above it is also worth to remember,
that in spite of displaying this "present imperfection
in relation to Himself after one million years", in
comparison with the imperfection of people God
is so immensely more perfect, that for the use of
humans with a simplified understanding of the world
He can also be described with the highly imprecise
word "perfect".
What is most interesting, God does NOT hide
from us His "relative imperfections". E.g. He
openly admits His "imperfections" in the
Bible (which, after all, is a kind of "autobiography" of God).
For example, in Genesis 18:20-21 is stated, quote:
'Then the LORD said, "The outcry against Sodom and Gomorrah is so great and their sin so grievous
that I will go down and see if what they have done is as bad as the outcry that has reached me. If not, I will know".' (NIV)
Clearly, God did not know the full scope of the
"goings on" in Sodom and Gomorrah at that time,
except what He had heard. So He was going to
"go down" and find out the facts for Himself,
then, He said, "I will know". The first information
for us that the above verses clearly indicate,
is that "God increases His knowledge continually".
After all, as those verses above state it, if God
initially doesn't know something, then God knows
something, that is an "increase of knowledge".
The second information for us that the above
verses also clearly reveal, is that God does NOT
"know everything". Again, as those verses above
from the book of Genesis show to us, God at
times chooses NOT to know certain things. Thus
"God choose not know all things all the time",
thereby having the potential to increase His
knowledge at times. In other words, "God
does NOT know everything".
This surprising for some people fact, that also
God continually learns and improves his methods
of action, is additionally confirmed by deductions
and evidence presented in item #D5 of the
totaliztic web page
newzealand_visit.htm.
The "relative imperfection of God" introduces
many hefty consequences to our everyday
lives. Most vital amongst these consequences
I am going to present gradually in my web
pages and monographs - only that because
of the limitations on sizes of web pages I will
present these in other web pages of totalizm
(i.e. not in this web page). An example of one
amongst such consequences is addressed
in items #B4 and #B5 of the totaliztic web page
will.htm - about the impact of "free will" on fate of the entire humanity.
#M2.
Benefits which we can reap by realising and accepting that humanity evolved from "water creatures" and that it arrived to Earth from the planet "Terra":
Everyone who managed to yield an effort
to learn the controversial theory about the
origin of mankind presented on this web
page, reaps from this a number of benefits.
Because these benefits carry in themselves
the potential for introducing positive changes
to our view of the world, and thus to the quality
of our lives, it is worth to list and to describe
at least the most important amongst them.
Here are these out of them, the influence of
which on our view of the world, and thus also
on our lives, can be experienced by practically
everyone amongst us:
(1)
A completely different view on the searches for the
"missing link", on the archaeological puzzles, and
strange megalithic structures such as pyramids, etc.
This realises to us how much energy, force, and
resources the administrators of the science are
pouring into telling people that black is white. (As
an example of the wastage of resources in order to
spread lies in the society, I would suggest to consider how much
costs the idle CETI program - i.e. searches for extraterrestrial
intelligences, while simultaneously destroyed are
systematically on Earth all these researchers who try to
investigate UFOnauts that for thousands of years
secretly keep arriving to Earth from the space.)
(2)
The less emotional, but the more philosophical
approach to the arguing about the origin of mankind,
about teaching evolution in schools, etc.
In fact, the realising what actually is going on, causes
that one stops putting emotions into the arguing
about the origin of the man. This is because one
begins to understand that these arguing is induced
on purpose along the principle "divide and rule".
(3)
The gaining of awareness of greater peace, someone's
protection, a sense of life, which is provided by an invisible
protection and supervision of God over everything that
happens around us. By knowing that God created
us, one has also an understanding that in eyes of God
our existence counts and our lives are under His protection.
(4)
Displaying the greater understanding for reports from
UFO abductions, from UFO sightings, etc. In
the result of knowledge of what actually is going on,
one begins to see differently someone's attempts
to scoff and hide the truth about the hidden activities
of UFOs on Earth.
(5)
The actual understanding what secretly is going on
around us. In turn due to understanding what is
secretly going on, one gains a better skills for living
in the world which is really governed by such hidden
powers.
#M3.
Research projects which are worth pursuing in order to extend further our knowledge about the evolution of man:
No view or theory is perfect and completely
finished on any stage of their existence.
After all, the views and theories, similarly to
people and everything that surrounds us,
are subjected to a continuous evolution. In
fact the formulation, publication, and bringing
to public attention of a view or theory is only
a beginning of work on the further refining
and developing them to even the greater
perfection. Similarly is also with the
theory on the origin of humanity described
on this web page. The publishing of this
theory on this web page only initiated
a whole series of detailed research and
discussions on the specific findings
which stem from it. These discussions and
research actually will allow to gradually
improve and polish this theory. Many
potential topics of the research are still
awaiting to be completed. Below I am
indicating several examples of such
topics for research and discussions,
into which readers are able to contribute
their own findings:
(1)
Finding the greater number of points in common,
which link views of evolutionists with views of disciples
of the creation of man. Such points in common
may serve towards the shortening the non-productive
arguing and starting instead the constructive research
and determining the true course of events.
(2)
Finding further highly evidential indicators that people
are related to whales and to dolphins. These indicators
complement and extend the evidence which is discussed
in item #F2 of this web page. They also make the evidence
more convincing.
(3)
The revealing of further "facts" about the true history
of mankind.
Such facts allow to learn a higher number of details
about the true of history of humanity.
Part #N:
Summary, and the final information of this web page:
#N1.
The summary of this web page:
Science is formed by people, not by kind
of errorless beings. In turn to err is
human. So we are not allowed to
assume, that something is true only
because it originates from scientists.
Especially in such important matter
as the origins of man. So in spite that
present scientists spread very professionally
sounding fables about our origins,
and in spite that they additionally
present various "evidence" which
supposedly support their claims,
each single one of us still has a
moral duty of thorough checking
and judging with our own conscience
the logic behind these fables, and
also the evidential value of whatever
scientists use to support these fables.
It is worth to remember then, a
sarcastic joke about the logic of
scientists and about the value of
"evidence" which scientists sometimes
use. This joke was widely repeated
in 1970s. Here is the content of it.
"A scientist carried out two experiments
with a flea. In the first experiment he placed
a flea on a table and ordered 'jump'.
The flea jumped. Then he cut off the
flea's back legs and again ordered
'jump'. The flea did not jump. So he
wrote in his thesis 'fleas have ears in
their back legs'."
On this web page presented are outcomes of
my own research into the origins of man.
(I.e. results of research about the origins of
man, worked out by
Dr Jan Pajak.)
These results are based on findings stemming
from the theory of everything
called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity.
If one summarises these investigations briefly,
they state that otherwise to
God -
which is simply a single huge natural computer,
the structure of human body is too complicated
to be able to come to existence in a result of purely
accidental evolution. Therefore all facts described
in more details in "part I" of the separate web
page about the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
indicate that it was God who come to the existence in
a result of natural evolution. In turn this God, after
he already existed, created initially the physical world,
and later created also humans. So humans are
products of the method of creative development
of unknown earlier things, which typically is called
a "method of a trial and error". But if this method of
creating is related to the origin of humans, then
it can be called the "intelligently controlled evolution".
The creation of man, similarly as the creation
of everything else, God based on outcomes of
whatever he created earlier. In case of humans,
the creature which God transformed in order to
obtain the required qualities of the body, was a
sea creature related to present whales and dolphins.
Therefore whales and dolphins in the light of
findings presented here are closest still alive
animal relatives of humans.
#N2.
Blogs of totalizm:
It is also worth to check periodically the blog
of totalizm available under the address
totalizm.wordpress.com and
totalizm.blox.pl/html.
(Notice that all these addresses hold the same
blog with the same content of messages.)
On this blog many matters discussed here are also explained with
additional details written as new events unveil before our eyes.
#N3.
Contact details of the
author
of this web page:
Current email addresses of the author of this web page, i.e.
Dr Jan Pajak
(while for the duration of 2007 - Prof. Dr Eng. Jan Pajak),
at which readers can post possible comments,
inquiries, or replies to questions which I ask on
my web pages, are provided on the web page
about me (Dr Jan Pajak).
That page also provides my postal address
and telephone numbers.
However, please notice that because of my
rather chronic lack of time, I reluctantly
reply to emails which contain JUST time
consuming requests, while simultaneously
they document a complete ignorance of their
author in the topic area which I am researching.
Therefore, if the reader sends a request to me,
I suggest to let me know somehow that he or
she actually went through the trouble of reading
my web pages and learning what these pages
try to say.
#N4.
How with the web page named
"skorowidz_links.htm"
one can find totaliztic descriptions
of topics in which he is interested:
A whole array of topics equally interesting
as these from the above web page, is also
discussed from the angle that is unique to
the philosophy of totalizm. All these related
topics can be found and identified with the use of
content index
prepared especially to make easier finding
these web pages and topics. The name "index"
means a list of "key words" usually provided
at the end of textbooks, which allows to find
fast the description or the topic in which we
are interested. My web pages also has such
a content "index" - only that it is additionally
supplied in green
links
which after "clicking" at them with a mouse
immediately open the web page with the topic
that interest the reader. This content "index"
is provided on the web page named
skorowidz_links.htm.
It can be called from the "organising" part of
"Menu 1" of every totaliztic web page. I would
recommend to look at it and to begin using it
systematically - after all it brings closer hundreds
of totaliztic topics which can be of interest to
everyone.
If you prefer to read in Polish
click on the Polish flag below
(Jeśli preferujesz czytanie w języku polskim
kliknij na poniższą flagę)
Date of starting this page: 23 June 2006
Date of the latest updating of this page: 17 May 2012
(Check in "Menu 3" whether there is even a more recent update!)
